Home Improvement in glycemic control over 11 years in patients monitored for diabetes in one county
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Improvement in glycemic control over 11 years in patients monitored for diabetes in one county

  • Lone G.M. Jørgensen , Per Hyltoft Petersen , Cramer Christensen , Ebbe Wendel Eriksen and Ivan Brandslund
Published/Copyright: September 21, 2011

Abstract

Background: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has been used in controlled trials for the last 10years but has never been evaluated in clinical practice as an effective parameter for clinical outcome. We investigated the trend for glycemic control over 11years in one county of 350,000 citizens.

Methods: We studied 226,382 HbA1c-DCCT-aligned from 39,455 patients in whom routine monitoring for diabetes was initiated in 1993, 1996, or 2001. The trend in glycemic control was investigated in groups by probit plots, and in individual patients by target plots.

Results: From 1993 to 2001, the number of HbA1c measurements increased three-fold. The number of new monitoring series increased from 0.22% to 0.27% of the county population, and the number of patients monitored using HbA1c as a proxy for diabetes increased from 0.5% to 1.5%. A proportional reduction in high HbA1c concentrations of 5% was identified in the 1993 group, compared to 15% in the 1996 group, and 20% in the 2001 group. The percentage of patients with diabetic first HbA1c experiencing normalization increased from 8% to 30% for males and from 9% to 24% for females (1993–2001). The percentage of HbA1c concentrations that were not normalized decreased from 78% to 53% for males and from 83% to 59% for females (1993–2001). The median HbA1c at initiation of monitoring decreased from 8.7% in 1993 to 7.5% in 2001 (p<10−5). The number of normal first HbA1c results in monitoring series increased from 7% to 17% for males and from 8% to 22% for females. Up to 10% of subjects developed diabetic concentrations during monitoring.

Conclusion: On average, patients with diabetic first HbA1c concentrations (≥6.62%) showed an improvement in glycemic control from 5% in 1993 to 20% in 2001. High concentrations were easiest to reduce. In patients with originally diabetic HbA1c levels, 66% on average showed improved glycemic control in the 2001 series compared to 50% in the 1993 series. An average of 6% (1993) vs. 9% (2001) with originally normal HbA1c levels showed an upward trend inHbA1c levels. Median HbA1c at initiation of monitoring decreased from 8.7% in 1993 to 7.5% in 2001 (p<10−5). The incidence of new cases was constant.


Corresponding author: Lone Jørgensen, 23 Hostrups Have, 1954 Frederiksberg C, Denmark Phone: +45 2140 5760,

References

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–86.10.1056/NEJM199309303291401Search in Google Scholar

2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complication trial. Diabetes 1995;44:969–83.Search in Google Scholar

3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–53.10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6Search in Google Scholar

4. Stratton IM, Adler A, Neil HAW, Matthews D, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Br Med J 2000; 321:405–12.10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405Search in Google Scholar

5. Khaw K-T, Wareham N, Lubin R, Bingham S, Oakes S, Welch A, et al. Glucated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk). Br Med J 2001; 322:15–8.10.1136/bmj.322.7277.15Search in Google Scholar

6. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28:103–17.10.1016/0168-8227(95)01064-KSearch in Google Scholar

7. The American Medical Association (AMA), The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), and The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Coordinated performance measurement for the management of adult diabetes. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/article/2403-4583.html.Search in Google Scholar

8. European Diabetes Policy Group 1999. A desktop guide to type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 1999;16:716–30 (http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/philip.home/t2dg1999.htm#H).10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00166.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Jeffcoate SL. Diabetes control and complications: the role of glycated haemoglobin, 25years on. Diabet Med 2003; 21:657–65.10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01065.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. StatBank Denmark, populations and elections (BEF1A). Copenhagen, Denmark: Statistics Denmark, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

11. Jørgensen LG, Brandslund I, Stahl M, Hyltoft Petersen P, Iversen S, Klitgaard N, et al. Upper reference limit, analytical quality specifications and clinical use of haemoglobin A1c. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2002; 62:609–22.10.1080/003655102764654349Search in Google Scholar

12. Hyltoft Petersen P, Blaabjerg O, Andersen M, Jørgensen LG, Schousboe K, Jensen E. Graphical interpretation of confidence curves in rankit plots. Clin Chim Lab Med 2004; 42:715–24.Search in Google Scholar

13. Jørgensen LG, Løber J, Carlsen NLT, Momsen G, Hirsch F. Serum neuron specific enolase (S-NSE) reference interval evaluation by time-resolved immunofluorometry compared with a radioimmunoassay. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 249:77–91.10.1016/0009-8981(96)06278-XSearch in Google Scholar

14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986: 1;307–10.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8Search in Google Scholar

15. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 286:1195–200.10.1001/jama.286.10.1195Search in Google Scholar

16. Steffes M, Cleary P, Goldstein D, Little R, Wiedmeyer HM, Rohlfing C, et al. Haemoglobin A1c measurements over nearly two decades: sustaining comparable values throughout the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study. Clin Chem 2005; 51:753–8.10.1373/clinchem.2004.042143Search in Google Scholar

17. World Health Organization. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Report of a World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation meeting. Geneva, Switzerland: WHI, 20022 (http://www.who.int/ncd/dia/screening_mnc03.pdf).Search in Google Scholar

18. McCance DR, Hanson RL, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, Hadden DR, Knowler WC. Diagnosing diabetes mellitus – do we need new criteria? Diabetologia 1997; 40:247–55.10.1007/s001250050671Search in Google Scholar

19. Alberti KG, Gries FA, Jervell J, Krans HM. A desk-top guide for the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM): an update. Diabet Med 1994; 11:899–909.10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00376.xSearch in Google Scholar

20. Hoelzel W, Weykamp C, Jeppsson JO, Miedema K, Barr JR, Goodall I, et al. IFCC Working Group on HbA1c Standardization. IFCC reference system for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the national standardization schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: a method-comparison study. Clin Chem 2004; 50:166–74.10.1373/clinchem.2003.024802Search in Google Scholar

21. Jørgensen LG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Brandslund I. The impact of variability in the risk of disease exemplified by diagnosing diabetes mellitus based on ADA and WHO criteria as gold standard. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management (IJRAM) 2005; 5:358–73.10.1504/IJRAM.2005.007177Search in Google Scholar

22. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al., for The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study group. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1343–50.10.1056/NEJM200105033441801Search in Google Scholar

23. Borch-Johnsen K. Forebyggelse af en folkesygdom og dens konsekvenser. Ugeskr Laeger 2004; 166:1316–20.Search in Google Scholar

24. National Board of Health. Diabetes i Danmark. Metodeudvikling til en registerbaseret vurdering af diabetesforkomst. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Board of Health, 2001 (http://www.sst.dk/nyheder/tidsskrifter/nyetal/pdf/nyetal5_8.pdf).Search in Google Scholar

25. Gale EA. Is there really an epidemic of type 2 diabetes? Lancet 2003; 362:503–4.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14148-7Search in Google Scholar

26. Jørgensen LG, Brandslund I, Hyltoft Petersen P, de Fine Olivarius N, Stahl M. The effect of the new ADA and WHO guidelines on the number of diagnosed diabetes mellitus cases. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003; 41:1246–50.10.1515/CCLM.2003.191Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2005-7-11
Accepted: 2005-10-25
Published Online: 2011-9-21
Published in Print: 2006-1-1

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Where does the evidence come from?
  2. NASBA: a novel approach to assess hormonal receptors and ERBB2 status in breast cancer
  3. Plasma cell-free DNA as an indicator of severity of injury in burn patients
  4. Bivariate statistical approach to evaluate laboratory performance by analysis of standard curves in an External Quality Assurance program for quantitative assays based on real-time PCR with Taq-Man™ probes
  5. Erythrocyte membrane acetylcholinesterase activity in subjects with MTHFR 677C→T genotype
  6. Plasma levels of tumor M2-pyruvate kinase should not be used as a tumor marker for hematological malignancies and solid tumors
  7. APO A-V–1131T→C polymorphism frequency and its association with morbidity in a Brazilian elderly population
  8. Association study between fibronectin and coronary heart disease
  9. Serum calcium and phosphorus associate with the occurrence and severity of angiographically documented coronary heart disease, possibly through correlation with atherogenic (apo)lipoproteins
  10. Urinary calcium excretion in severe preeclampsia and eclampsia
  11. In vitro re-mineralization of demineralized bone matrix in human serum
  12. Measurement of serum amyloid A1 (SAA1), a major isotype of acute phase SAA
  13. Disturbed lipoprotein composition in non-dialyzed, hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and post-transplant patients with chronic renal failure
  14. Measurement of serum testosterone using high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry
  15. Quantitative bacterial micro-assay for rapid detection of serum phenylalanine on dry blood-spots: application in phenylketonuria screening
  16. N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: normal ranges in the pediatric population including method comparison and interlaboratory variability
  17. A new quality control model using performance goals based on biological variation in External Quality Assurance Schemes
  18. Improvement in glycemic control over 11 years in patients monitored for diabetes in one county
  19. The clinical usefulness of glucose tolerance testing in gestational diabetes to predict early postpartum diabetes mellitus
  20. Analytical performance of a new two-step ADVIA Centaur® estradiol immunoassay during ovarian stimulation
  21. EC4 European Syllabus for Post-Graduate Training in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine: version 3 – 2005
  22. POX-Act assay and d-ROMs test – what are the facts?
  23. External quality control of urinary methyl malonic acid quantification – announcement of a pilot study
Downloaded on 7.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2006.018/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button