Home Automated flagging influences the inconsistency and bias of band cell and atypical lymphocyte morphological differentials
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Automated flagging influences the inconsistency and bias of band cell and atypical lymphocyte morphological differentials

  • Wim van der Meer , Colin Stephen Scott and MarinusH. de Keijzer
Published/Copyright: June 1, 2005

Abstract

This study evaluated inter- and intra-observer variabilities of band cell and atypical lymphocyte differentials and the influence of instrument flagging information on resulting microscopic differentials. Five stained slides with a range of band cell counts and five with variable numbers of atypical lymphocytes were sent for morphological review by 30 technicians. No supplementary full blood cell count information was provided. Two months later, the same slides were sent, together with their corresponding analyzer reports comprising the full blood cell count, automated differentials and flags, to the same technicians. The first and second appraisals of band cells and variant lymphocytes both showed poor levels of inter-observer consistency. Observed values for all slides were very wide and suggested a high inherent predisposition to erroneous reporting practices. Analysis of category trends showed that analyzer left shift or immature granulocytes flags had no influence on observer band cell assessments as downward vs. upward category revisions were evenly balanced. The findings for atypical lymphocytes were, however, somewhat different. Two slides with no flags both showed balanced category revisions, whereas two of the three slides with atypical lymphocyte flags showed clear evidence of upward category revision. The third slide with an atypical lymphocyte flag did not show any overall category trend, but six of the seven observers who in the first examination recorded atypical lymphocyte estimates of ≤30% revised their estimates upward when the slides were examined the second time. These results suggest that morphologist access to an analyzer report and flagging information is unlikely to affect the “randomness” of band cell determinations but it may induce observer bias in variant lymphocyte estimates.

Published Online: 2005-6-1
Published in Print: 2004-4-5

Copyright © 2004 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Articles in the same Issue

  1. How useful are haematology analyser flags?
  2. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG): modes of action in the clinical management of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and selected autoimmune disorders
  3. Automated flagging influences the inconsistency and bias of band cell and atypical lymphocyte morphological differentials
  4. Extracellular concentration of homocysteine in human cell lines is influenced by specific inhibitors of cyst(e)ine transport
  5. Generation of eight adjacent mutations in a single step using a site-directed mutagenesis kit
  6. Prohepcidin accumulates in renal insufficiency
  7. Impurities from polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes as a potential source of interference in simultaneous analysis of multiple lipid-soluble antioxidants by HPLC with electrochemical detection
  8. Cerebrospinal fluid tau and Aβ42 concentrations in healthy subjects: delineation of reference intervals and their limitations
  9. The influence of smoking on plasma homocysteine and cysteine levels in passive and active smokers
  10. Reference change values and power functions
  11. A different approach to analyzing age-related HbA1c values in non-diabetic subjects
  12. Ratio of urinary free immunoglobulin light chain κ to λ in the diagnosis of Bence Jones proteinuria
  13. Influence of blood collection in plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator tubes on hormone and tumour marker levels
  14. Multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay for procalcitonin measurement on the Kryptor® System
  15. Comparison of three commercial assays for the measurement of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17α-OHPR): limitations of the quality control system
  16. Analytical performance of the Albumin Cobalt Binding (ACB®) test on the Cobas MIRA® Plus analyzer
  17. Letter to the Editor
  18. Meetings and Awards
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.066/html
Scroll to top button