Home The White Blood Cell Differential: Three Methods Compared
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The White Blood Cell Differential: Three Methods Compared

  • Rüdiger Siekmeier , Alexa Bierlich and Werner Jaroß
Published/Copyright: June 1, 2005
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
From the journal Volume 39 Issue 5

Abstract

The analysis of the automated blood cell count is an essential tool in haematological diagnostics. However, in the case of the white blood cell differential the microscopy method, although tedious, often serves as reference. We evaluated the ABX Pentra 120 Retic haematology analyser in comparison to the Coulter STKS haematology system and the microscopy method with respect to accuracy, precision and reliability. We compared 308 samples (239 samples from adults and 69 from children) including patients with oncological diseases. The comparison of the white blood cell differential revealed strong correlations between the results obtained with the ABX Pentra 120 Retic and the microscopy method, the Coulter STKS and the microscopy method and both automated methods (values of paediatric samples in parentheses; neutrophils: rS≥0.933 (rS≥0.951), lymphocytes: rS≥0.907 (rS≥0.945), monocytes: rS≥0.584 (rS≥0.459) and eosinophils: rS≥0.963 (rS≥0.966)). The analytical performance of automatic analysers for the detection of the morphological “left shift” was determined for all samples in comparison to the microscopical white blood cell differential. The sensitivity, specificity and efficiency depended strongly on the chosen threshold levels and were different for both analysers. The sensitivity for flagging a left shift increased with an increasing proportion of neutrophil bands, metamyelocytes, myelocytes and promyelocytes. Our study suggests that the ABX Pentra 120 Retic haematology analyser, as well as the Coulter STKS haematology system are useful tools for routine analysis in haematology.

:
Published Online: 2005-06-01
Published in Print: 2001-06-06

Copyright © 2001 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Articles in the same Issue

  1. SIBioC 2001 33rd National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology
  2. CCLM: The Near Future
  3. Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor and Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
  4. Circulating Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors in Premature Coronary Atherosclerosis
  5. Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for the Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen mRNA in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Prostate Carcinoma Using the TaqManTM Detection System
  6. Serum Cardiac Troponin I after Conventional and Minimal Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
  7. Improvement of the Quantitative Method for Glucose Determination Using Hexokinase and Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase
  8. Conditions for Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP) Analysis of BRCA1 Gene Using an Automated Electrophoresis Unit
  9. Discrepancies between Apolipoprotein E Phenotyping and Genotyping in the Elderly
  10. Markers of Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women Receiving Hormone Replacement Therapy
  11. Reference Intervals for the Markers of Proteinuria with a Standardised Bed-Rest Collection of Urine
  12. The Friedewald Formula Underestimates LDL Cholesterol at low Concentrations
  13. The White Blood Cell Differential: Three Methods Compared
  14. Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide Measured by Fully-Automated Immunoassay and by Immunoradiometric Assay Compared
  15. Length of Sedimentation Reaction in Undiluted Blood (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate): Variations with Sex and Age and Reference Limits
  16. Biochemical Analysis of the Sperm and Infertility
  17. Evaluation of a Rapid Bedside Immunochromatographic Assay for Detection of Cardiac Troponin I in Whole Blood
  18. Correct Graphic Presentation of Method Comparison Data
  19. European Symposium on Clinical Laboratory and In Vitro Diagnostics Industry
Downloaded on 14.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2001.069/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoq-KtKDe94pinsEM1hPEdyGkWSAnHOkhERH8_-HYCVrlVzwRawI
Scroll to top button