Home A re-evaluation of the taxonomic status of Halophila euphlebia Makino (Hydrocharitaceae) based on morphological features and ITS sequence data
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A re-evaluation of the taxonomic status of Halophila euphlebia Makino (Hydrocharitaceae) based on morphological features and ITS sequence data

  • Masayuki Uchimura , Etienne Jean Faye , Satoshi Shimada , Shogo Arai , Tetsunori Inoue and Yoshiyuki Nakamura
Published/Copyright: April 7, 2006
Botanica Marina
From the journal Volume 49 Issue 2

Abstract

Identification of Halophila ovalis samples from various parts of the world has long been accompanied by taxonomic uncertainties because of morphological variability. This led to the hypothesis that H. ovalis represents a “collective species” which may include cryptic species. Recent studies applying molecular techniques to the assessment of phylogenetic relationships in the genus Halophila also came to a similar conclusion. In this study, one Halophila species from Japan, previously described as H. euphlebia and later treated as a synonym of H. ovalis, was critically re-examined using molecular phylogenetic analyses of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Morphological examinations of vegetative and reproductive structures were also undertaken. Results obtained from both morphological and molecular data, combined with a critical review of the relevant literature provide support for recognition of the plant in question as being distinct from H. ovalis. The entity conforms to Makino's description of H. euphlebia. This raises the current number of Halophila species in Japan to three: H. ovalis, H. decipiens and H. euphlebia.

:

Corresponding author

References

Aioi, K. and M. Nakaoka. 2003. The seagrasses of Japan. In: (E.P. Green and F.T. Short, eds) World atlas of seagrasses. University of California Press, Berkeley. pp. 185–192.Search in Google Scholar

den Hartog, C. 1957. Hydrochariatceae. In: (C.G.G.J. Van Stennis and R.E. Holttum, eds) Flora malesiana. Ser. 1, vol. 5. pp. 381–413.Search in Google Scholar

den Hartog, C. 1970. The seagrasses of the world. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam/London. pp. 275.Search in Google Scholar

Doty, M.S. and B.C. Stone. 1966. Two new species of Halophila (Hydrocharitaceae). Brittonia18: 303–306.10.2307/2805146Search in Google Scholar

Eiseman, N.J. and C. McMillan. 1980. A new species of seagrass, Halophila johnsonii, from the Atlantic coast of Florida. Aquat. Bot.9: 15–19.Search in Google Scholar

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution39: 783–91.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.xSearch in Google Scholar

Green, E.P. and F.T. Short. 2003. World atlas of seagrasses. Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. University of California Press, Berkeley. pp. 298.Search in Google Scholar

Jukes, T.H. and C.R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: (H.M. Munro, ed.) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York. pp. 21–123.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, J. 2000. Taxonomic notes on Halophila ovata and Halophila minor.Biol. Mar. Med.7: 79–82.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, J. and C. den Hartog. 2001. Seagrass taxonomy and identification key. In: (F.T. Short and R.G. Coles, eds). Global seagrass research methods. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. pp. 31–58.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, J. and H. Kirkman. 1992. Fruits, seeds and germination in the seagrass Halophila ovalis (Hydrocharitaceae). Bot. Mar.35: 197–204.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, J., Z. Kanamoto, T. Toma and M. Nishihara. 1995. Occurrence of Halophila decipiens Ostenfeld (Hydrocharitaceae) in Okinawa Island, Japan. Aquat. Bot.51: 329–334.10.1016/0304-3770(95)00467-ESearch in Google Scholar

Larkum, A.W.D. 1995. Halophila capricorni (Hydrocharitaceae): a new species of seagrass from the Coral Sea. Aquat. Bot.51: 319–328.10.1016/0304-3770(95)00474-ESearch in Google Scholar

Makino, T. 1912. Observations on the flora of Japan. Bot. Mag. Tokyo26: 208–222.10.15281/jplantres1887.26.307_208Search in Google Scholar

Masamune, M. 1964. Icones plantarum marinarum notoensis I. Halophyla ovalis Hook. f. Ann. Rep. Noto. Mar. Lab.4: 1–2.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumura, J. 1895. Miscellaneous notes on botany. Bot. Mag. Tokyo9: 67–70. (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

McDermid, K.J., M.C. Gregoritza, J.W. Reeves and D.W. Freshwater. 2003. Morphological and genetic variation in the endemic seagrass Halophila hawaiiana (Hydrocharitaceae) in the Hawaiian archipelago. Pac. Sci.57: 199–209.10.1353/psc.2003.0017Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, C. and S.C. Williams. 1980. Systematic implications of isozymes in Halophila section Halophila. Aquat. Bot.9: 21–31.10.1016/0304-3770(80)90004-2Search in Google Scholar

Miki, S. 1934a. On the seagrasses in Japan (II). Cymodoceae and marine Hydrocharitaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo48: 131–142.10.15281/jplantres1887.48.131Search in Google Scholar

Miki, S. 1934b. On the seagrasses in Japan (III). General consideration on the Japanese seagrasses. Bot. Mag. Tokyo48: 171–178.Search in Google Scholar

Nozawa, Y. 1972. On the seagrass from Ishigaki Island. Mem. Kagoshima Junshin Junior College2: 56–66. (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

Ostenfeld, C.H. 1902. Hydrocharitaceae, Lemnaceae, Pontederiaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Gentianaceae (Limnanthemum), Nympheaceae. Bot. Tidssk.23: 260–261.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, R.C. and E.G. Meñez. 1988. Seagrasses. Smithson. Contrib. Mar. Sci.34: 1–104.10.5479/si.01960768.34Search in Google Scholar

Sachet, M.H. and F.R. Fosberg. 1973. Remarks on Halophila (Hydrocharitaceae). Taxon22: 439–443.10.2307/1219332Search in Google Scholar

Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, K. and M. Nei. 2000. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Mol. Biol. Evol.17: 1251–1258.Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, T., K. Nozawa and L. Nozawa. 1962a. The distribution of seagrass in Japan. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.20: 180–183. (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, T., K. Nozawa and L. Nozawa. 1962b. On the seagrasses from the southwestern islands of Japan. Mem. South. Indus. Sci. Inst., Kagoshima Univ.3: 105–111. (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

Terada, A. 1981. Species components of seagrass communities and their relationship to bottom substrata along the coast of Okinawa Island. Undergraduate thesis. University of Ryukyu, Department of Marine Sciences. pp. 41. (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

Tsuda, R.T. and S. Kamura. 1990. Comparative review on the floristics, phytogeography, seasonal aspects and assemblage patterns of the seagrass flora in Micronesia and the Ryukyu Islands. Galaxea9: 77–93.Search in Google Scholar

Waycott, M., D.W. Freshwater, R.A. York, A. Calladine and W.J. Kenworthy. 2002. Evolutionary trends in the seagrass genus Halophila (Thouars): insights from molecular phylogeny. Bull. Mar. Sci.7: 1299–1308.Search in Google Scholar

Womersley, H.B.S. 1984. The marine benthic flora of Southern Australia. Part I. Adelaide. pp. 329.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2006-04-07
Published in Print: 2006-04-01

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 20.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/BOT.2006.015/html
Scroll to top button