Evolutionary selection pressure and family relationships among connexin genes

Véronique Cruciani; Svein-Ole Mikalsen

doi:10.1515/BC.2007.028

Article

Evolutionary selection pressure and family relationships among connexin genes

Véronique Cruciani and Svein-Ole Mikalsen

Published/Copyright: March 5, 2007

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Volume 388 Issue 3

Abstract

We suggest an extension of connexin orthology relationships across the major vertebrate lineages. We first show that the conserved domains of mammalian connexins (encoding the N-terminus, four transmembrane domains and two extracellular loops) are subjected to a considerably more strict selection pressure than the full-length sequences or the variable domains (the intracellular loop and C-terminal tail). Therefore, the conserved domains are more useful for the study of family relationships over larger evolutionary distances. The conserved domains of connexins were collected from chicken, Xenopus tropicalis, zebrafish, pufferfish, green spotted pufferfish, Ciona intestinalis and Halocynthia pyriformis (two tunicates). A total of 305 connexin sequences were included in this analysis. Phylogenetic trees were constructed, from which the orthologies and the presumed evolutionary relationships between the sequences were deduced. The tunicate connexins studied had the closest, but still distant, relationships to vertebrate connexin36, 39.2, 43.4, 45 and 47. The main structure in the connexin family known from mammals pre-dates the divergence of bony fishes, but some additional losses and gains of connexin sequences have occurred in the evolutionary lineages of subsequent vertebrates. Thus, the connexin gene family probably originated in the early evolution of chordates, and underwent major restructuring with regard to gene and subfamily structures (including the number of genes in each subfamily) during early vertebrate evolution.

Keywords: gap junctions; gene family; genome databases; species-specific genes

Corresponding author svein-ole.mikalsen@rr-research.no

References

Alexopoulos, H., Böttger, A., Fischer, S., Levin, A., Wolf, A., Fujisawa, T., Hayakawa, S., Gojobori, T., Davies, J.A., David, C.N., et al. (2004). Evolution of gap junctions: the missing link? Curr. Biol.14, R879–R880.10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.067Search in Google Scholar

Baldauf, S.L. (2003). Phylogeny for the faint of heart: a tutorial. Trends Genet.19, 345–351.10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00112-4Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, M.V., and Zukin, R.S. (2004). Electrical coupling and neuronal synchronization in the mammalian brain. Neuron41, 495–511.10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00043-1Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, M.V.L., Barrio, L.C., Bargiello, T.A., Spray, D.C., Hertzberg, E., and Sáez, J.C. (1991). Gap junctions: new tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron6, 305–320.10.1016/0896-6273(91)90241-QSearch in Google Scholar

Bennett, M.V.L., Zheng, X., and Sogin, M.L. (1994). The connexins and their family tree. Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser.49, 223–233.Search in Google Scholar

Bierne, N., and Eyre-Walker, A. (2003). The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates: implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias. Genetics165, 1587–1597.10.1093/genetics/165.3.1587Search in Google Scholar

Burke, R.D., Angerer, L.M., Elphick, M.R., Humphrey, G.W., Yaguchi, S., Kiyama, T., Liang, S., Mu, X., Agca, C., Klein, W.H., et al. (2006). A genomic view of the sea urchin nervous system. Dev. Biol.300, 434–460.10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Costello, J.F., and Plass, C. (2001). Methylation matters. J. Med. Genet.38, 285–303.10.1136/jmg.38.5.285Search in Google Scholar

Cruciani, V., and Mikalsen, S.-O. (2002). Connexins, gap junctional intercellular communication and kinases. Biol. Cell94, 433–443.10.1016/S0248-4900(02)00014-XSearch in Google Scholar

Cruciani, V., and Mikalsen, S.-O. (2005). The connexin gene family in mammals. Biol. Chem.386, 325–332.10.1515/BC.2005.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cruciani, V., and Mikalsen, S.O. (2006). The vertebrate connexin family. Cell Mol. Life Sci.63, 1125–1140.10.1007/s00018-005-5571-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cruciani, V., Heintz, K.-M., Husøy, T., Hovig, E., Warren, D.J., and Mikalsen, S.-O. (2004). The detection of hamster connexins: a comparison of expression profiles with wild- type mouse and the cancer-prone Min mouse. Cell Commun. Adhes.11, 155–171.10.1080/15419060500242877Search in Google Scholar

Curtin, K.D., Zhang, Z., and Wyman, R.J. (1999). Drosophila has several genes for gap junction proteins. Gene232, 191–201.10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00123-7Search in Google Scholar

de Boer, T.P. and Van der Heyden, M.A.G. (2005). Xenopus connexins: how frogs bridge the gap. Differentiation73, 330–340.10.1111/j.1432-0436.2005.00026.xSearch in Google Scholar

Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D., and Philippe, H. (2006). Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature439, 965–968.10.1038/nature04336Search in Google Scholar

Douzery, E.J., Snell, E.A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F., and Philippe, H. (2004). The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101, 15386–15391.10.1073/pnas.0403984101Search in Google Scholar

Duret, L., and Mouchiroud, D. (2000). Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol.17, 68–74.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026239Search in Google Scholar

Eastman, S.D., Chen, T.H., Falk, M.M., Mendelson, T.C., and Iovine, M.K. (2006). Phylogenetic analysis of three complete gap junction gene families reveals lineage-specific duplications and highly supported gene classes. Genomics87, 265–274.10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W.M. (1970). Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool.19, 99–113.10.2307/2412448Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W.M. (2000). Homology. A personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet.16, 227–231.10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02005-9Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, S.E., Green, C.R., Bode, H.R., and Gilula, N.B. (1987). Selective disruption of gap junctional communication interferes with a patterning process in Hydra. Science237, 49–55.10.1126/science.3037697Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Giannelli, F. and Green, P.M. (2000). The X chromosome and the rate of deleterious mutations in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet.67, 515–517.10.1086/303010Search in Google Scholar

Gimlich, R.L., Kumar, N.M., and Gilula, N.B. (1990). Differential regulation of the levels of three gap junction mRNAs in Xenopus embryos. J. Cell Biol.110, 597–605.10.1083/jcb.110.3.597Search in Google Scholar

Gu, X., Wang, Y., and Gu, J. (2002). Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet.31, 205–209.10.1038/ng902Search in Google Scholar

Hendy, M.D., and Penny, D. (1989). A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool.38, 297–309.10.2307/2992396Search in Google Scholar

Hombach, S., Janssen-Bienhold, U., Söhl, G., Schubert, T., Büssow, H., Ott, T., Weiler, R., and Willecke, K. (2004). Functional expression of connexin57 in horizontal cells of the mouse retina. Eur. J. Neurosci.19, 2633–2640.10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03360.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hua, V.B., Chang, A.B., Tchieu, J.H., Kumar, N.M., Nielsen, P.A., and Saier, M.H., Jr. (2003). Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of 4 TMS junctional proteins of animals: connexins, innexins, claudins and occludins. J. Membr. Biol.194, 59–76.10.1007/s00232-003-2026-8Search in Google Scholar

Hurst, L.D. (2002). The K_a/K_s ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet.18, 486–487.10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02722-1Search in Google Scholar

Jeffery, W.R., Strickler, A.G., and Yamamoto, Y. (2004). Migratory neural crest-like cells form body pigmentation in a urochordate embryo. Nature431, 696–699.10.1038/nature02975Search in Google Scholar

Kanno, L., and Loewenstein, W.R. (1964). Intercellular diffusion. Science143, 959–960.10.1126/science.143.3609.959Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, N.M., and Gilula, N.B. (1992). Molecular biology and genetics of gap junction channels. Semin. Cell Biol.3, 3–16.10.1016/S1043-4682(10)80003-0Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., and Hedges, S.B. (1998). A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature392, 917–920.10.1038/31927Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Tamura, K., and Nei, M. (2004). MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinform.5, 150–163.10.1093/bib/5.2.150Search in Google Scholar

Lin, J.H., Yang, J., Liu, S., Takano, T., Wang, X., Gao, Q., Willecke, K., and Nedergaard, M. (2003). Connexin mediates gap junction-independent resistance to cellular injury. J. Neurosci.23, 430–441.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-02-00430.2003Search in Google Scholar

Loewenstein, W.R. (1979). Junctional intercellular communication and the control of growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta560, 1–65.10.1016/0304-419X(79)90002-7Search in Google Scholar

Mesnil, M. (2002). Connexins and cancer. Biol. Cell94, 493–500.10.1016/S0248-4900(02)00025-4Search in Google Scholar

Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002). Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520–562.10.1038/nature01262Search in Google Scholar

Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Nunn, R.S., Macke, T.J., Olson, A.J., and Yeager, M. (2001). Transmembrane α-helices in the gap junction membrane channel: systematic search of packing models based on the pair potential function. Microsc. Res. Tech.52, 344–351.10.1002/1097-0029(20010201)52:3<344::AID-JEMT1018>3.0.CO;2-4Search in Google Scholar

O'Brien, J., Al-Ubaidi, M.R., and Ripps, H. (1996). Connexin 35: a gap-junctional protein expressed preferentially in the skate retina. Mol. Biol. Cell7, 233–243.10.1091/mbc.7.2.233Search in Google Scholar

Okamura, Y., Nishino, A., Murata, Y., Nakajo, K., Iwasaki, H., Ohtsuka, Y., Tanaka-Kunishima, M., Takahashi, N., Hara, Y., Yoshida, T., et al. (2005). Comprehensive analysis of the ascidian genome reveals novel insights into the molecular evolution of ion channel genes. Physiol. Genomics22, 269–282.10.1152/physiolgenomics.00229.2004Search in Google Scholar

Panopoulou, G., Hennig, S., Groth, D., Krause, A., Poustka, A.J., Herwig, R., Vingron, M., and Lehrach, H. (2003). New evidence for genome-wide duplications at the origin of vertebrates using an amphioxus gene set and completed animal genomes. Genome Res.13, 1056–1066.10.1101/gr.874803Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, P., and Starich, T.A. (2001). Innexins get into the gap. BioEssays23, 388–396.10.1002/bies.1057Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Risek, B., Guthrie, S., Kumar, N., and Gilula, N.B. (1990). Modulation of gap junction transcript and protein expression during pregnancy in the rat. J. Cell Biol.110, 269–282.10.1083/jcb.110.2.269Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Sáez, J.C., Berthoud, V.M., Brañes, M.C., Martínez, A.D., and Beyer, E.C. (2003). Plasma membrane channels formed by connexins: their regulation and functions. Physiol. Rev.83, 1359–1400.10.1152/physrev.00007.2003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sasakura, Y., Shoguchi, E., Takatori, N., Wada, S., Meinertzhagen, I.A., Satou, Y., and Satoh, N. (2003). A genome-wide survey of developmentally relevant genes in Ciona intestinalis. X. Genes for cell junctions and extracellular matrix. Dev. Genes Evol.213, 303–313.Search in Google Scholar

Sitnikova, T., Rzhetsky, A., and Nei, M. (1995). Interior-branch and bootstrap tests of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol.12, 319–333.Search in Google Scholar

Söhl, G., and Willecke, K. (2003). An update on connexin genes and their nomenclature in mouse and man. Cell Commun. Adhes.10, 173–180.10.1080/cac.10.4-6.173.180Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stoker, M.G.P. (1967). Transfer of growth inhibition between normal and virus-transformed cells: autoradiographic studies using marked cells. J. Cell Sci.2, 293–304.10.1242/jcs.2.3.293Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sved, J., and Bird, A. (1990). The expected equilibrium of the CpG dinucleotide in vertebrate genomes under a mutation model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87, 4692–4696.10.1073/pnas.87.12.4692Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tamura, K., and Kumar, S. (2002). Evolutionary distance estimation under heterogeneous substitution pattern among lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol.19, 1727–1736.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor, J.S., Braasch, I., Frickey, T., Meyer, A., and Van de Peer, Y. (2003). Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res.13, 382–390.10.1101/gr.640303Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Theissen, G. (2002). Secret life of genes. Nature415, 741.Search in Google Scholar

Vandepoele, K., De Vos, W., Taylor, J.S., Meyer, A., and Van de Peer, Y. (2004). Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101, 1638–1643.10.1073/pnas.0307968100Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wei, C.-J., Xu, X., and Lo, C.W. (2004). Connexins and cell signaling in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.20, 811–838.10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.144309Search in Google Scholar PubMed

White, T.W., Wang, H., Mui, R., Litteral, J., and Brink, P.R. (2004). Cloning and functional expression of invertebrate connexins from Halocynthia pyriformis. FEBS Lett.577, 42–48.10.1016/j.febslet.2004.09.071Search in Google Scholar

Willecke, K., Eiberger, J., Degen, J., Eckardt, D., Romualdi, A., Güldenagel, M., Deutsch, U., and Söhl, G. (2002). Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome. Biol. Chem.383, 725–737.10.1515/BC.2002.076Search in Google Scholar

Yoshizaki, G., Patiño, R., and Thomas, P. (1994). Connexin messenger ribonucleic acids in the ovary of Atlantic croaker: molecular cloning and characterization, hormonal control, and correlation with appearance of oocyte maturational competence. Biol. Reprod.51, 493–503.10.1095/biolreprod51.3.493Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (2003). Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol. Evol.18, 292–298.10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00033-8Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L., and Li, W.H. (2004). Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Mol. Biol. Evol.21, 236–239.10.1093/molbev/msh010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2007-03-05

Published in Print: 2007-03-01

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2007.028

Keywords for this article

gap junctions; gene family; genome databases; species-specific genes