Home L'avant-garde littéraire roumaine et la politique
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

L'avant-garde littéraire roumaine et la politique

  • Ion Pop
Published/Copyright: October 24, 2007
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
arcadia
From the journal Volume 41 Issue 2

Abstract

Voicing initially a rather general critique of bourgeois culture and society – which was characteristic also of other European vanguard movements such as futurism, Dada, constructivism and surrealism – many militants of the Romanian avant-garde groups moved in the 1930s and 1940s towards an outspoken Marxist engagement, as evinced by the publications of Stephan Roll (pseudonym of Gheorghe Dinu) in the last issues of the review unu. As a result of this engagement, Marxist avant-gardists came to regard the avant-garde itself as a product of a decadent, bourgeois mindset, and called for a “true” aesthetic engagement in proletarian struggles, following the example of the USSR. Signs of an “engagement” may also be discerned in the surrealists Gherasim Luca and Gellu Naum in the 1940s. In line with André Breton they tried to reconcile the surrealist programme with the “total liberation of mankind.” Ironically, however, the Romanian communist regime muzzled the avant-garde: the old avant-garde militants had to submit to the ideological commands of “social realism” or leave their country.

Published Online: 2007-10-24
Published in Print: 2006-12-19

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 16.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ARCA.2006.021/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button