Chapter Ten – We Told You So: Why Courts Won’t Hold Trump Accountable for Incitement

Chapters in this book

1. Frontmatter i
2. Contents v
3. Acknowledgments vii
4. Preface ix
5. Introduction: Advocacy, Incitement, and Imminent Lawless Action 1
6. PART I: THE THEORETICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF BRANDENBURG
7. Chapter One – Tolerating the Violent: The Liberal Egalitarian Justifications for the Brandenburg Test 27
8. Chapter Two – Anti-Orthodoxy, Inclusion, and the Advocacy of Violence 47
9. Chapter Three – Free Speech, Social Justice, and Brandenburg 65
10. PART II: INCITEMENT EXTENSIONS
11. Chapter Four – Criminal Solicitation and Incitement as Borderline Criminal Speech: Wily Agitators and Fuzzy Lines 85
12. Chapter Five – Words Behind Walls: Examining the Line Between Incitement and Administrative Overreach in Prisons 105
13. Chapter Six – I Fought the Law, and the First Amendment Won: How the Brandenburg Test Safeguards Musical Expression 123
14. Chapter Seven – “Terrorism” and Arguments to Disregard Brandenburg’s Incitement Test 143
15. PART III: BRANDENBURG IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA
16. Chapter Eight – Incitement on the Internet: Rethinking First Amendment Standards in Cyberspace 167
17. Chapter Nine – Incitement in Context 187
18. Chapter Ten – We Told You So: Why Courts Won’t Hold Trump Accountable for Incitement 207
19. Conclusion: The Future of Brandenburg, Incitement, and the First Amendment 225
20. Appendix A – Brandenburg v. Ohio 241
21. Appendix B – Relevant US Supreme Court Rulings 247
22. Contributors 251
23. Index 255