Home Philosophy Wittgenstein and Schlick: Two Approaches to Expression
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Wittgenstein and Schlick: Two Approaches to Expression

  • Jesús Padilla Gálvez

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the concept of expression in Ludwig Wittgenstein’s work and to contrast it with the corresponding proposals made by Moritz Schlick. According to Wittgenstein, an expression (Ausdruck) is everything that essentially determines the sense of a proposition. Expression presupposes the form of all propositions in which it is found, and it is considered the characteristic feature that all kinds of propositions have in common. The expression is represented by the form that requires subsequent corrections and improvements. Wittgenstein considered the form of the expression to remain constant whereas everything else is variable. Expressions are represented by a variable whose values are determined by the propositions of which they form part. Therefore, the expression only makes sense when expressed in propositions. Schlick took a different approach by recognizing that the symbolic relation of designation or attribution characterizes the essence of knowledge. As such, designation is always a symbolic expression or representation. In his view, expression plays a crucial role in the cognitive process as it allows us to relate a sign to a state of affairs. On the one hand, statements or what Schlick called “constatements” stand for propositions about “what is currently perceived”, and on the other hand, they have the function of “confirming hypotheses, in verification”. This knowledge must always be communicable. Both philosophers coincide that knowledge begins where something is expressed and communicated. What is communicable can be expressed by means of symbols, be it words or other signs. Contrasting the two positions allows for a more sophisticated analysis of the concept of “expression”.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the concept of expression in Ludwig Wittgenstein’s work and to contrast it with the corresponding proposals made by Moritz Schlick. According to Wittgenstein, an expression (Ausdruck) is everything that essentially determines the sense of a proposition. Expression presupposes the form of all propositions in which it is found, and it is considered the characteristic feature that all kinds of propositions have in common. The expression is represented by the form that requires subsequent corrections and improvements. Wittgenstein considered the form of the expression to remain constant whereas everything else is variable. Expressions are represented by a variable whose values are determined by the propositions of which they form part. Therefore, the expression only makes sense when expressed in propositions. Schlick took a different approach by recognizing that the symbolic relation of designation or attribution characterizes the essence of knowledge. As such, designation is always a symbolic expression or representation. In his view, expression plays a crucial role in the cognitive process as it allows us to relate a sign to a state of affairs. On the one hand, statements or what Schlick called “constatements” stand for propositions about “what is currently perceived”, and on the other hand, they have the function of “confirming hypotheses, in verification”. This knowledge must always be communicable. Both philosophers coincide that knowledge begins where something is expressed and communicated. What is communicable can be expressed by means of symbols, be it words or other signs. Contrasting the two positions allows for a more sophisticated analysis of the concept of “expression”.

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Table of Contents V
  3. Wittgenstein Publications Referred to by Abbreviation XI
  4. Editorial 1
  5. I Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: 100 Years After
  6. Is There Aesthetics in the Tractatus? And If There Is, What Is It Doing There? 5
  7. ‚Also‘ sprach Wittgenstein: Prepositional Logic and Modal Qualificational Logic in the Tractatus 19
  8. “So Too it is Impossible for There to Be Propositions of Ethics”. A Novel Approach to Tractatus 6.42¹ 33
  9. Mauthner, Wittgenstein, and the Kraus Circle 45
  10. Tautologies and Theorems: The Epistemology of Logic of the Tractatus Is Not Self-Undermining 59
  11. Remarks on the Notion of ‘Expression’ in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus – Against the Background of Frege’s Early Essays 73
  12. The Tractatus, Ethics, and the Unsayable 85
  13. Against Auto-Da-Fé: A Sanguine Reading of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus 101
  14. Wittgenstein’s Battlefield: The Kerensky Offensive 117
  15. Über den definitiven Text der Logisch-Philosophischen Abhandlung. Die Geschichte der bisherigen Textverbesserungen und einige neue Vorschläge 133
  16. Some Early Reactions to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus 145
  17. Wittgenstein on the Difficulty of Rejecting Metaphysics 165
  18. Unveiling the Complexity: Three Levels of Ethics in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus 185
  19. Wittgenstein in Green I: Ramsey Translates the Tractatus 199
  20. „Well then, what is logic about?“ – Anmerkungen zu einer als „überwunden“ geltenden Debatte über die „Gesetze des Denkens“ 211
  21. About a Possible Chronological Order of Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic 227
  22. An Outline of a Genetic Reading of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus 255
  23. “Found Objects” in Wittgenstein: Concepts of the Meter 271
  24. The Epistemology of the Tractatus 287
  25. II Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle
  26. “So one cannot, e. g., say ‘There are objects’ as one says ‘There are books’”. From Tractatus 4.1272 to Carnap via On Certainty 35– 37 303
  27. Wittgenstein and Ramsey on Probability, Frequency, and Belief 319
  28. Open Texture in Science and Philosophy 335
  29. Wittgenstein and Schlick: Two Approaches to Expression 347
  30. Our Method: Between Tractatus and Scientific World-Conception 361
  31. A Bull in a China Shop? Neurath on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus 375
  32. III Wittgenstein after the Tractatus
  33. The Unfortunate Pitfalls and Fruitful Temptations of Over-Interpretation 399
  34. Sraffa, Piccoli, and Wittgenstein’s 1931 Remarks on Gestures: A Reassessment 417
  35. Seeing the World Aright: Some Remarks on the Relations among Ethics, Aesthetics, and Philosophy in Wittgenstein’s Early Work up to 1930 431
  36. Peculiar Presences and Remarkable Absences: Wittgenstein in Postmodernist French Philosophy 443
  37. Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophical Feeling and “the Relative Position of Logic and Mechanics” 463
  38. Skepticism in the Tractatus and in On Certainty 477
  39. Wittgensteins Ringen mit den Grenzen der Sprache 489
  40. Wittgenstein on Grammar in the Blue Book 507
  41. „Mancher wird sagen, daß mein Reden über den Begriff des Wissens irrelevant sei“ (BPP II, 289). Wittgensteins Kritik an den philosophischen Idealen des Sublimen und der Sublimierung 519
  42. IV 70 Years after Wittgenstein’s Death: Nachlass, Editions, and New Sources
  43. “I should publish those old ideas and the new ones together” or: Tragedy and Irony in the History of Editing Wittgenstein as Exemplified in the Story of Peter Philipp’s Edition Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus – Philosophische Untersuchungen 539
  44. Wittgensteins Gedankenbewegungen am Beispiel seines zweiten Buchprojekts, des Big Typescript: Die Zettelsammlung TS 212 – eine gewaltige Gedächtnisleistung – die zugleich Wittgensteins Schwierigkeiten zeigt, seine Gedanken in eine der damals möglichen Buchformen zu zwingen 549
  45. The Wittgenstein–Richards Correspondence and a Three-Level Model of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass 567
  46. Copyright in Wittgenstein’s Nachlass 585
  47. Von Wright as Wittgenstein’s Literary Executor 595
  48. Nonsensical Actions and the Justification of Rules 619
  49. Index 633
Downloaded on 17.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111453040-025/html
Scroll to top button