Home Philosophy Viral Social Movements, State(s) of Emergency, and the Insurgent Public Realm: A Philosophical Analysis of China’s 2020 – 2022 Social Movements
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Viral Social Movements, State(s) of Emergency, and the Insurgent Public Realm: A Philosophical Analysis of China’s 2020 – 2022 Social Movements

  • Loki Chan
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, we argue that a new form of social movements emerged in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, that we characterize as ‘viral social movements’, drawing upon the earlier concept of networked social movements. We analyze three events that capture key developments in the modalities of ‘viral social movements’ in China: the passing of Dr. Li Wenliang, the Shanghai lockdowns, and the White Paper Protests of late 2022. We invoke Benjamin’s concept of the ‘real state of emergency’ in formulating the historical philosophy of these movements. We end by contextualizing the movement within the history of liberal dissent in China. While this new form of social movement can be productive in driving political change in repressive societies, it can prove unsustainable when confronted with powerful repression. Emancipatory philosophy must reckon with both the promises and perils of ’viral social movements’ within the broader context of the ’postmodernization’ of social movements.

Abstract

In this article, we argue that a new form of social movements emerged in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, that we characterize as ‘viral social movements’, drawing upon the earlier concept of networked social movements. We analyze three events that capture key developments in the modalities of ‘viral social movements’ in China: the passing of Dr. Li Wenliang, the Shanghai lockdowns, and the White Paper Protests of late 2022. We invoke Benjamin’s concept of the ‘real state of emergency’ in formulating the historical philosophy of these movements. We end by contextualizing the movement within the history of liberal dissent in China. While this new form of social movement can be productive in driving political change in repressive societies, it can prove unsustainable when confronted with powerful repression. Emancipatory philosophy must reckon with both the promises and perils of ’viral social movements’ within the broader context of the ’postmodernization’ of social movements.

Downloaded on 6.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111193748-011/html
Scroll to top button