Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Poor, Foreign, and Desperate: Philostratus’ Fictional Letter-writer Persona in the Erotic Letters
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Poor, Foreign, and Desperate: Philostratus’ Fictional Letter-writer Persona in the Erotic Letters

  • Owen Hodkinson
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper will examine the fictional persona - or personae - of the epi­stolographer in Philostratus’ Erotic Epistles. Recent studies of this collection of love letters (even leaving aside the letters in the corpus that are not erotic) have tended to emphasise its disunity, seen for instance in its fragmented collection of moments, which is akin to Barthes’ A Lovers’ Discourse (Schmitz); in its potential use as a store­house of erotic persuasion (Goldhill). Of course, there is no clear, single persona that emerges from this collection, whether one to be identified with aspects of the Philos­tratean author or not. Yet at the same time, the epistolographer has been frequently described as seeming in several letters solipsistic, fetishistic, impoverished, an exile, and as possessing other rather negative or unusual characteristics for one attempting to persuade a would-be lover; and it is with good reason that no one has tried to argue that others of the letters present him in contrastingly positive terms. Further conside­ration is needed about the effect for the reader of these letters circulating together - both read as if from the same fictional persona, and read as some highly fictionalised version of the Philostratus under whose name they were collected. In this text as in others, Philostratus is capable of playful and sophisticated fictional and metafictio­nal techniques, including (especially) in the creation of narrators’ and other impor­tant speakers’/writers’ personae. This paper will explore some of these techniques in the Erotic Epistles, including reassessment of the more consistently negative aspects of the fictional persona.

Abstract

This paper will examine the fictional persona - or personae - of the epi­stolographer in Philostratus’ Erotic Epistles. Recent studies of this collection of love letters (even leaving aside the letters in the corpus that are not erotic) have tended to emphasise its disunity, seen for instance in its fragmented collection of moments, which is akin to Barthes’ A Lovers’ Discourse (Schmitz); in its potential use as a store­house of erotic persuasion (Goldhill). Of course, there is no clear, single persona that emerges from this collection, whether one to be identified with aspects of the Philos­tratean author or not. Yet at the same time, the epistolographer has been frequently described as seeming in several letters solipsistic, fetishistic, impoverished, an exile, and as possessing other rather negative or unusual characteristics for one attempting to persuade a would-be lover; and it is with good reason that no one has tried to argue that others of the letters present him in contrastingly positive terms. Further conside­ration is needed about the effect for the reader of these letters circulating together - both read as if from the same fictional persona, and read as some highly fictionalised version of the Philostratus under whose name they were collected. In this text as in others, Philostratus is capable of playful and sophisticated fictional and metafictio­nal techniques, including (especially) in the creation of narrators’ and other impor­tant speakers’/writers’ personae. This paper will explore some of these techniques in the Erotic Epistles, including reassessment of the more consistently negative aspects of the fictional persona.

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110983739-006/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button