Skip to main content
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3 Using Assertibility Conditions to Extract and Evaluate Arguments

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Analysis and Practices
This chapter is in the book Analysis and Practices

Chapters in this book

  1. I-VIII I
  2. Introduction 1
  3. Argumentation Evaluation
  4. 1 Argumentative Validity as a Function of the Argumentative Forum 7
  5. 2 A 'Logical Audit' Scheme for Argument Evaluation 17
  6. 3 Using Assertibility Conditions to Extract and Evaluate Arguments 25
  7. 4 Types of Argument and the Critical Reader 34
  8. Fallacies
  9. 5 When is Fallacy a Fallacy? 45
  10. 6 When No Reason is Good Reason 56
  11. 7 A Sketch of an Epistemic Theory of Fallacies 65
  12. 8 Cognitive Development and Fallacies 75
  13. Legal Argumentation
  14. 9. Interpretation, Law, and Argument: Prospects for Cross Fertilization 85
  15. 10 Modes of Judicial Discourse: The Search for Argument Fields 94
  16. 11 Deduction in Law 102
  17. 12 Can we Require Legislatures to State the Reasons for their Legislative Decisions? 110
  18. 13 The Arguments of a Judge 119
  19. 14 Ne Bis in Idem and Related Principles 123
  20. 15 The American Jury Trial: The Art of Argument in Voir Dire and Opening Statements 131
  21. 16 Argument in the Law: The Special Case of the Small Claims Court 142
  22. 17 The 'Lawyer's Dialect' and Sir Edward Coke's Advice on Courtroom Argumentation 152
  23. Special Fields
  24. Arguing over Incommensurable Values 163
  25. 19 Beyond Argumentation: The Role of Narrative in Moral Reasoning 170
  26. 20 Moral and Aesthetic Argumentation 178
  27. 21 The Fallacy of the Improbable Cure 187
  28. 22 Quantification of Claims of Value: Counting the Birds 191
  29. 23 Policy Science as an Argumentative Paradigm 199
  30. 24 On Dialogue-Games, Argumentation, and Literature 209
  31. 25 Argumentation and Literary Text: Towards an Operational Model 217
  32. 26 The Universality of Logic Processes in Japanese Argument 225
  33. 27 Communicating Across Cultures: Argument and International Negotiation 238
  34. Case Studies
  35. 28 The 1982 Falklands/Malvinas War: A Case Study in Public Argument 253
  36. 29 Pronouns for Strategic Purposes 261
  37. 30 Politique et fête: Eléments de rhétorique dans des voeux présidentiels de de Gaulle, Giscard d'Estaing et Mitterand 270
  38. 31 The Keegstra Case: The Anti-Semitic Argument in Modern Day Alberta Schools 278
  39. 32 Political and Legal Convergence: A Case Study of the Sacco-Vanzetti Trial 289
  40. 33 Representations of Ideology: Analogons, Images, and Ideographs 298
  41. 34 Aristotelian Dialectic and Reasoning in Das Kapital of Marx 308
  42. 35 An Argumentation-Theoretical Analysis of Lenin's Political Strategies 317
  43. 36 The Argumentation of Self in Job- Interviews 327
  44. 37 Argument Strategies Used by Female Inmates Requesting Parole Hearings 337
  45. Education in Argumentation
  46. 38 A Critical Theory of Critical Thinking 349
  47. 39 Skills, Attitudes, and Education for Critical Thinking 358
  48. 40 The Form of Television and the Possibility of Critical Thinking 366
  49. 41 Perspectives on Argumentation Instruction 376
  50. 42 Formalism, Fallacies, and the Teaching of Informal Lotic 386
  51. 43 Designing a Test of Inductive Reasoning 394
  52. 44 A Program for Teacher Education in Reasoning Skills 404
  53. List of Contributors 411
Downloaded on 25.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110869170.25/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button