Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

7 The politics of intervisuality

Euripides’ Erechtheus, the West Pediment of the Parthenon, the Erechtheion, and the temple of Athena Nike
  • Lucia Athanassaki
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Intervisuality
This chapter is in the book Intervisuality

Abstract

This chapter explores the political significance of Euripides’ dialogue in Erechtheus with three major Athenian temples, namely the West Pediment of the Parthenon, the temple of Athena Nike, and the Erechtheion. In Section 7.1, I discuss my take on ‘intervisuality’ (a) by offering an outline of my basic premises in studying Euripides’ dialogue with Athenian monumental architecture and iconography and (b) by drawing illustrative examples from Ion, which features unambiguous visual references, the widest range of viewing patterns, and, unlike Erechtheus, is preserved in its entirety. In Section 7.2, I turn to Erechtheus and focus on its points of contact with the West Pediment of the Parthenon, the Erechtheion and the temple of Athena Nike. In Section 7.3, I explore the politics of intervisuality: taking my lead from Athena’s cultic instructions to Praxithea in Erechtheus, I correlate the goddess’ conciliatory plan with historical events, cultic initiatives, and artistic developments on the Acropolis in the second half of the Archidamian war. I argue that Euripides gives pride of place to the Erechtheion because, unlike the West Pediment of the Parthenon and the temple of Athena Nike that foreground competition and strife, the Erechtheion conveys a different message, the need for reconciliation and peaceful co-existence on the divine and human level, to which Erechtheus gives verbal expression and reinforcement.

Abstract

This chapter explores the political significance of Euripides’ dialogue in Erechtheus with three major Athenian temples, namely the West Pediment of the Parthenon, the temple of Athena Nike, and the Erechtheion. In Section 7.1, I discuss my take on ‘intervisuality’ (a) by offering an outline of my basic premises in studying Euripides’ dialogue with Athenian monumental architecture and iconography and (b) by drawing illustrative examples from Ion, which features unambiguous visual references, the widest range of viewing patterns, and, unlike Erechtheus, is preserved in its entirety. In Section 7.2, I turn to Erechtheus and focus on its points of contact with the West Pediment of the Parthenon, the Erechtheion and the temple of Athena Nike. In Section 7.3, I explore the politics of intervisuality: taking my lead from Athena’s cultic instructions to Praxithea in Erechtheus, I correlate the goddess’ conciliatory plan with historical events, cultic initiatives, and artistic developments on the Acropolis in the second half of the Archidamian war. I argue that Euripides gives pride of place to the Erechtheion because, unlike the West Pediment of the Parthenon and the temple of Athena Nike that foreground competition and strife, the Erechtheion conveys a different message, the need for reconciliation and peaceful co-existence on the divine and human level, to which Erechtheus gives verbal expression and reinforcement.

Downloaded on 11.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110795448-008/html
Scroll to top button