Home Linguistics & Semiotics A cross-linguistic approach to sentential subjects in Kannada
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A cross-linguistic approach to sentential subjects in Kannada

  • Anuradha Sudharsan
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Trends in South Asian Linguistics
This chapter is in the book Trends in South Asian Linguistics

Abstract

In Kannada, only nominalized clauses can occupy the canonical subject position whereas non-nominalized clauses can occupy only the object position. Nominalized clauses have an overt D head, whereas non-nominalized clauses lack it. Two factors explain this subject/object asymmetry. Firstly, finite T is always +Case, whereas only transitive v has Case. Secondly, the fact that only nominalized clauses can occupy Case positions shows that only an overt nominal head can receive Case. A (Non-)Overt Head Constraint is proposed to exclude non-nominalized clauses from Case positions. Cross-linguistic facts corroborate this claim and also explain why that-clauses in English tend to extrapose.

Abstract

In Kannada, only nominalized clauses can occupy the canonical subject position whereas non-nominalized clauses can occupy only the object position. Nominalized clauses have an overt D head, whereas non-nominalized clauses lack it. Two factors explain this subject/object asymmetry. Firstly, finite T is always +Case, whereas only transitive v has Case. Secondly, the fact that only nominalized clauses can occupy Case positions shows that only an overt nominal head can receive Case. A (Non-)Overt Head Constraint is proposed to exclude non-nominalized clauses from Case positions. Cross-linguistic facts corroborate this claim and also explain why that-clauses in English tend to extrapose.

Downloaded on 15.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110753066-005/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button