Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie The Auction of Pharaoh Revisited
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Auction of Pharaoh Revisited

  • Andrew Hogan
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
New Approaches in Demotic Studies
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch New Approaches in Demotic Studies

Abstract

The Ptolemaic state auction was an institutional instrument employed by the Ptolemies from relatively early in their hegemony over Egypt. Though, in practice, more akin to a modern silent auction, it served at the state and local level to allocate tax farming, state monopolies, certain priestly offices, and land/property that was abandoned or ceded in legal decisions. In 1999, Manning stated that the study of the demotic material was not the final word on the topic of the auction of pharaoh.1 In what follows, I intend to address this very issue. First, I present the demotic evidence for the state auction (the auction of pharaoh, ʿyš n pr-ʿȝ) and situate it in conjunction with the parallel contemporary Greek evidence, particularly with respect to documentary typology and the conclusions that may be drawn from this comparison. After this establishment of the textual evidence, the auction is operationalized as a pragmatic adaptation of a Greek financial institution that the Ptolemies employed as part of a broader series of reforms with the aims of increasing revenue for the royal state and creating intra-elite competition. Its subsequent use for a similar purpose in the elite temple sphere testifies to the depth of its adoption. Finally, I suggest further ways in which the institution of the auction can be situated within the broader context of institutional development in the eastern Mediterranean in the 1st millennium BC.

Abstract

The Ptolemaic state auction was an institutional instrument employed by the Ptolemies from relatively early in their hegemony over Egypt. Though, in practice, more akin to a modern silent auction, it served at the state and local level to allocate tax farming, state monopolies, certain priestly offices, and land/property that was abandoned or ceded in legal decisions. In 1999, Manning stated that the study of the demotic material was not the final word on the topic of the auction of pharaoh.1 In what follows, I intend to address this very issue. First, I present the demotic evidence for the state auction (the auction of pharaoh, ʿyš n pr-ʿȝ) and situate it in conjunction with the parallel contemporary Greek evidence, particularly with respect to documentary typology and the conclusions that may be drawn from this comparison. After this establishment of the textual evidence, the auction is operationalized as a pragmatic adaptation of a Greek financial institution that the Ptolemies employed as part of a broader series of reforms with the aims of increasing revenue for the royal state and creating intra-elite competition. Its subsequent use for a similar purpose in the elite temple sphere testifies to the depth of its adoption. Finally, I suggest further ways in which the institution of the auction can be situated within the broader context of institutional development in the eastern Mediterranean in the 1st millennium BC.

Heruntergeladen am 5.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110664874-005/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen