Skip to main content
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Marx’s Philosophy on Natural History

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Natural Born Monads
This chapter is in the book Natural Born Monads

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to clarify how Marx criticized the idealist concept of nature. By analyzing Marx’s texts, I will focus on their relation to Hegel’s teleology, in which nature is taken as an intermediate stage of process wherein the idea as a logical category gradually begins to actualize itself in the objective world. By distancing himself from Hegelian idealism, Marx reached his own concept of natural history wherein nature is always considered to remain non-identical to human beings. As I will argue, Marx’s critical concept of nature is motivated by his critique of the notion that humans are somehow dominant over nature. Marx’s claim that nature cannot be completely dominated by human individuals led him to a reflection on the existence of human individuals and how they cannot be properly understood outside of the dialectical relationship that they entertain with nature. As I will claim in the conclusion, Marx’s understanding of the human individual is made up of a dialectical relationship between individual, nature, and society. Furthermore, I will also claim that this dialectical relationship can prevent us from accepting a reductive and organicist understanding of human beings.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to clarify how Marx criticized the idealist concept of nature. By analyzing Marx’s texts, I will focus on their relation to Hegel’s teleology, in which nature is taken as an intermediate stage of process wherein the idea as a logical category gradually begins to actualize itself in the objective world. By distancing himself from Hegelian idealism, Marx reached his own concept of natural history wherein nature is always considered to remain non-identical to human beings. As I will argue, Marx’s critical concept of nature is motivated by his critique of the notion that humans are somehow dominant over nature. Marx’s claim that nature cannot be completely dominated by human individuals led him to a reflection on the existence of human individuals and how they cannot be properly understood outside of the dialectical relationship that they entertain with nature. As I will claim in the conclusion, Marx’s understanding of the human individual is made up of a dialectical relationship between individual, nature, and society. Furthermore, I will also claim that this dialectical relationship can prevent us from accepting a reductive and organicist understanding of human beings.

Downloaded on 9.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110604665-007/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button