Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie Diagrammatizing Mathematics: Some Remarks on a Revolutionary Aspect of Ancient Greek Mathematics
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Diagrammatizing Mathematics: Some Remarks on a Revolutionary Aspect of Ancient Greek Mathematics

  • Claas Lattmann
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper takes a fresh look at the ancient mathematical diagram from the viewpoint of semiotic model theory. It discusses, first, the ontological nature and epistemic function of diagrams; second, the characteristics of their interrelation and interaction with the textual part of mathematical proofs; third, their epistemic validity; and, fourth, their ‘revolutionary’ nature as per Thomas S. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. The analysis is based on an understanding of ancient mathematical diagrams as ‘diagrams’ as defined by Charles S. Peirce. Such a ‘diagram’ is a specific sort of iconic sign, and thus ‘model,’ that represents the relational structure of its object by way of its own relational quality. Against this backdrop, this paper shows: (1) that the diagram stands as a holistic model for a general mathematical structure (2) that consists of ‘diagrammatical atoms’ (3) that represent the general entities of mathematical theory; (4) and that this abstract model is being constructed and subsequently analyzed in the textual part of the proof, (5) the purpose of which is, accordingly, to ‘show’ that this model has the specific sought-for, yet unknown mathematical properties. (6) Given this, Greek mathematical proof turns out to be an analysis of static general models, rather than an either implicit or failed (mathematically) inductive argumentation concerned with particular cases.

Abstract

This paper takes a fresh look at the ancient mathematical diagram from the viewpoint of semiotic model theory. It discusses, first, the ontological nature and epistemic function of diagrams; second, the characteristics of their interrelation and interaction with the textual part of mathematical proofs; third, their epistemic validity; and, fourth, their ‘revolutionary’ nature as per Thomas S. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. The analysis is based on an understanding of ancient mathematical diagrams as ‘diagrams’ as defined by Charles S. Peirce. Such a ‘diagram’ is a specific sort of iconic sign, and thus ‘model,’ that represents the relational structure of its object by way of its own relational quality. Against this backdrop, this paper shows: (1) that the diagram stands as a holistic model for a general mathematical structure (2) that consists of ‘diagrammatical atoms’ (3) that represent the general entities of mathematical theory; (4) and that this abstract model is being constructed and subsequently analyzed in the textual part of the proof, (5) the purpose of which is, accordingly, to ‘show’ that this model has the specific sought-for, yet unknown mathematical properties. (6) Given this, Greek mathematical proof turns out to be an analysis of static general models, rather than an either implicit or failed (mathematically) inductive argumentation concerned with particular cases.

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110565959-006/html?srsltid=AfmBOoq_DOsqNQFghiy3hdLUBVUyhOCQuKdOmjif7hp9kUON7D7u1wah
Button zum nach oben scrollen