Home Philosophy The Wittgensteinian and the ontological (3-dimensional) reaction to the naturalistic challenge
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Wittgensteinian and the ontological (3-dimensional) reaction to the naturalistic challenge

  • Edmund Runggaldier
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
From Arithmetic to Metaphysics
This chapter is in the book From Arithmetic to Metaphysics

Abstract

Starting with a trustworthy theory T, Galvan (1992) suggests to read off, from the usual hierarchy of theories determined by consistency strength, a finer-grained hierarchy in which theories higher up are capable of ‘explaining’, though not fully justifying, our commitment to theories lower down. One way to ascend Galvan’s ‘hierarchy of explanation’ is to formalize soundness proofs: to this extent it often suffices to assume a full theory of truth for the theory T whose soundness is at stake. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of an extension of this method. Our ultimate goal will be to extend T not only with truth axioms, but with a combination of axioms for predicates for truth and necessity.We first consider two alternative strategies for providing possibleworlds semantics for necessity as a predicate, one based on classical logic, the other on a supervaluationist interpretation of necessity. We will then formulate a deductive system of truth and necessity in classical logic that is sound with respect to the given (nonclassical) semantics.

Abstract

Starting with a trustworthy theory T, Galvan (1992) suggests to read off, from the usual hierarchy of theories determined by consistency strength, a finer-grained hierarchy in which theories higher up are capable of ‘explaining’, though not fully justifying, our commitment to theories lower down. One way to ascend Galvan’s ‘hierarchy of explanation’ is to formalize soundness proofs: to this extent it often suffices to assume a full theory of truth for the theory T whose soundness is at stake. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of an extension of this method. Our ultimate goal will be to extend T not only with truth axioms, but with a combination of axioms for predicates for truth and necessity.We first consider two alternative strategies for providing possibleworlds semantics for necessity as a predicate, one based on classical logic, the other on a supervaluationist interpretation of necessity. We will then formulate a deductive system of truth and necessity in classical logic that is sound with respect to the given (nonclassical) semantics.

Downloaded on 23.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110529494-020/html
Scroll to top button