Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Mankind’s Past: Evolution or Progress?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mankind’s Past: Evolution or Progress?

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Imagines Antiquitatis
This chapter is in the book Imagines Antiquitatis

Abstract

The author argues that there were two views of social development in classical antiquity. One of these, associated principally with the Stoic tradition, acknowledged great advances in the arts and sciences, in philosophy and in social life, but supposed that human nature remained essentially the same. The other tradition, deriving mainly from Epicureanism, saw rather an evolutionary transformation of human nature from an early asocial state, in which people were hardy enough to survive on their own, to a new condition of mutual dependency, during which sentiments of affection and pity emerged. The views of Epicurus, Lucretius, Posidonius, Manilius, Seneca, Polybius, Plato, Juvenal and Lactantius are discussed.

Abstract

The author argues that there were two views of social development in classical antiquity. One of these, associated principally with the Stoic tradition, acknowledged great advances in the arts and sciences, in philosophy and in social life, but supposed that human nature remained essentially the same. The other tradition, deriving mainly from Epicureanism, saw rather an evolutionary transformation of human nature from an early asocial state, in which people were hardy enough to survive on their own, to a new condition of mutual dependency, during which sentiments of affection and pity emerged. The views of Epicurus, Lucretius, Posidonius, Manilius, Seneca, Polybius, Plato, Juvenal and Lactantius are discussed.

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110521689-002/html
Scroll to top button