Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik 7. A prolegomenon to the syntax of the relative clause in the Eastern Grassfields Bantu borderland
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

7. A prolegomenon to the syntax of the relative clause in the Eastern Grassfields Bantu borderland

  • Pius N. Tamanji und Blasius Achiri-Taboh
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the similarities in the morpho-syntactic and prosodic properties of relative clauses in two Eastern Grassfields Bantu languages, Bafut and Medumba, showing that every argument position in them is relativizeable. We discuss strategies of relative clause formation, showing that both Bafut (in the Ngemba sub-group) and Medumba (in the Nun sub-group), employ a relative determiner in agreement with the relativized antecedent, although Bafut, in addition, also makes use of the regular (relative) complementizer either in alternation or collocation with the relative determiner. It is shown that the two languages exhibit other striking similarities with respect to the syntax and prosody of the relative clause. Specifically, we discuss the occurrence, in both languages, of subject markers after (relativized) lexical subjects, phonetic breaks between overt relative markers/complementizers and overt subjects, resumptive pronouns in every relativized position, and a relative definiteness marker at the end of the matrix relative clause. Finally, we look at the possibility of A-bar movement within the relative clause of both languages, showing that empirical generalisations from the distribution of idiom chunks, binding, and reconstruction effects support a movement analysis for relative clause constructions in Nun and Ngemba languages.

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the similarities in the morpho-syntactic and prosodic properties of relative clauses in two Eastern Grassfields Bantu languages, Bafut and Medumba, showing that every argument position in them is relativizeable. We discuss strategies of relative clause formation, showing that both Bafut (in the Ngemba sub-group) and Medumba (in the Nun sub-group), employ a relative determiner in agreement with the relativized antecedent, although Bafut, in addition, also makes use of the regular (relative) complementizer either in alternation or collocation with the relative determiner. It is shown that the two languages exhibit other striking similarities with respect to the syntax and prosody of the relative clause. Specifically, we discuss the occurrence, in both languages, of subject markers after (relativized) lexical subjects, phonetic breaks between overt relative markers/complementizers and overt subjects, resumptive pronouns in every relativized position, and a relative definiteness marker at the end of the matrix relative clause. Finally, we look at the possibility of A-bar movement within the relative clause of both languages, showing that empirical generalisations from the distribution of idiom chunks, binding, and reconstruction effects support a movement analysis for relative clause constructions in Nun and Ngemba languages.

Heruntergeladen am 1.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110469547-007/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen