Dismantling Solidarity

Why has old-age security become less solidaristic and increasingly tied to risky capitalist markets? Drawing on rich archival data that covers more than fifty years of American history, Michael A. McCarthy argues that the critical driver was policymakers' reactions to capitalist crises and their political imperative to promote capitalist growth.

Michael A. McCarthy is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Marquette University.

As McCarthy rightly points out, the connection between developments of the welfare state and state management of economic crises has been drawn before. McCarthy's contribution, apart from skillfully tracing the history of the private pension system... is his explanation for and analysis of the contingency of retirement income. Dismantling Solidarity is an excellent account of the history of private pensions, but it is also a window into the future.

McCarthy navigates his theoretical terrain deftly and efficiently, taking the heavily dog-eared body of structuralist-Marxist state theory (Block, O’Connor, Offe, and Poulantzas) and makes it feel fresh.... Dismantling Solidarity joins a welcome influx of new scholarship that, in its framing and focus, calls attention to the fact that ours is a political moment that hungers for smart class analysis.

Offers not only an excellent and comprehensive overview but also a critical discussion of how the retirement security system has developed in the United States since World War II. With [McCarthy's] in-depth understanding of the U.S. welfare state, labor relations in general, and old-age security in particular, the author has written a coherent and informative book.... A great book that gives a masterful overview of howold-age security has developed in the United States, and it explains these developments with convincing arguments.Without any hesitation, I would recommend Dismantling Solidarity to a broad readership, including researchers and students in sociology, history, political science, and economics as well as stakeholders and policymakers.

Ira Katznelson, Ruggles Professor of Political Science and History, Columbia University, author of Fear Itself:

When a fresh voice is open to surprise reports on original research about a subject of fundamental importance, intellectual and political illumination can follow, as it does in this challenging and compelling book. This is policy history of the first rank.

Richard Lachmann, University at Albany, State University of New York, author of Capitalists in Spite of Themselves:

Over the past half century, Americans' retirement pensions have become more subject to market risks. Michael A. McCarthy offers an innovative and rigorously constructed explanation for this change, linking it to politicians’ efforts to manage crises while the balance of class forces shifted. This book advances our knowledge of recent political history and offers a model of how to understand the interaction of legislative and class politics.

Greta R. Krippner, author of Capitalizing on Crisis:

Michael A. McCarthy marshals original historical research to get deep into the institutional details of pension financing and to trace the shifting alignments made possible by those institutional arrangements. The resulting work is a valuable contribution to the literature on the development of the public/private welfare state that should be consulted by any serious student of American political economy.

Wolfgang Streeck, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, coeditor of The End of Diversity?:

Liberalization and privatization have many faces and come in a wide variety of ways. Michael A. McCarthy shows how Social Security, originally a public, nonmarket institution, is gradually penetrated by market forces and turned market-compatible in a capitalist context. The book makes an important contribution to the political economy of the welfare state and its transformation under the impact of liberalization.

Cedric de Leon, Providence College, author of The Origins of Right to Work:

In Dismantling Solidarity, Michael A. McCarthy argues that policymakers drove the gradual privatization of retirement security. They did so, however, within two key constraints, namely, the structure of capitalism itself and the balance of class forces. McCarthy walks us through three periods in the transformation of American pensions: the initial drive to privatization after World War II; the initial financialization of pensions with Taft-Hartley and ERISA; and finally, the enormous shift from defined benefit plans to defined contribution or 401K plans. McCarthy offers a highly sophisticated, historically sensitive alternative hypothesis that turns on the interaction of multiple sets of actors. More sociologists should do work like this.