Home Linguistics & Semiotics Causative alternation in Tianjin Sign Language
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Causative alternation in Tianjin Sign Language

  • Jia He and Gladys Tang
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
East Asian Sign Linguistics
This chapter is in the book East Asian Sign Linguistics

Abstract

This paper examines the phenomenon of causative alternation in Tianjin Sign Language (TJSL), a variety sign language used by deaf people in Tianjin, China, and addresses the long-standing debate about the relationship between classifier handshape and the verb argument structure of classifier predicates using TJSL data. Initially, we adopt the classifier typology of Benedicto and Brentari (2004) and identify three types of causative alternation in TJSL. First, lexical causatives such as BREAK, which alternate between causative and unaccusative predicates without any change of the verb’s morphological form and in the absence of classifier morphemes. Second, causative-unaccusative alternation in classifier predicates requiring classifier handshape change, namely a handling classifier for transitive predicates and a whole entity classifier for unaccusative predicates. Third, causative-unaccusative alternation in classifier predicates involving no change of classifier handshape and verb root. We argue that neither is the handling classifier a causative marker nor is the whole entity classifier an unaccusative marker in TJSL. Additionally, Benedicto and Brentari’s (2004) proposal that classifier type determines the argument structure of predicates fails to apply to TJSL straightforwardly. The paper also attempts to align the current observations in TJSL with Haspelmath’s (1993) typology of causative alternation in the world’s languages, namely, TJSL displays properties of subtypes of non-directed alternation - labile and equipollent alternation. Such a typological alignment enables us to appreciate the nature of the verb root and the classifier morpheme of classifier predicates in TJSL.

Abstract

This paper examines the phenomenon of causative alternation in Tianjin Sign Language (TJSL), a variety sign language used by deaf people in Tianjin, China, and addresses the long-standing debate about the relationship between classifier handshape and the verb argument structure of classifier predicates using TJSL data. Initially, we adopt the classifier typology of Benedicto and Brentari (2004) and identify three types of causative alternation in TJSL. First, lexical causatives such as BREAK, which alternate between causative and unaccusative predicates without any change of the verb’s morphological form and in the absence of classifier morphemes. Second, causative-unaccusative alternation in classifier predicates requiring classifier handshape change, namely a handling classifier for transitive predicates and a whole entity classifier for unaccusative predicates. Third, causative-unaccusative alternation in classifier predicates involving no change of classifier handshape and verb root. We argue that neither is the handling classifier a causative marker nor is the whole entity classifier an unaccusative marker in TJSL. Additionally, Benedicto and Brentari’s (2004) proposal that classifier type determines the argument structure of predicates fails to apply to TJSL straightforwardly. The paper also attempts to align the current observations in TJSL with Haspelmath’s (1993) typology of causative alternation in the world’s languages, namely, TJSL displays properties of subtypes of non-directed alternation - labile and equipollent alternation. Such a typological alignment enables us to appreciate the nature of the verb root and the classifier morpheme of classifier predicates in TJSL.

Downloaded on 13.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781501510243-005/html
Scroll to top button