Startseite Musik [4] deafness
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

[4] deafness

Weitere Titel anzeigen von Duke University Press
Keywords in Sound
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Keywords in Sound
[4] Mara MillsdeafnessA deaf spectrum—or “deafnesses”—has replaced the deaf/hearing binary in both the biomedical and cultural realms. At the same time, audiometric categories of hearing impairment do not map neatly onto deaf identities. Depending on technology use and community affiliation, individuals with audiograms that register similar types of impairment might identify quite differently as Deaf (a cultural group defined by sign language use), deaf, late-deafened, deaf-blind, hearing, or hard of hearing. Deafness may be used colloquially to designate any kind of hearing difference; however, members of Deaf culture often reject the term as itself pathologizing.In addition, Deaf scholars have reconceived hearing loss as deaf gain to ac-count for the new representations, communities, and forms of cognition afforded by bodily and communicative difference (Bauman and Murray 2009). These gains range from the neurodiversity that accompanies visual-gestural languages to aesthetic and technical innovations. With regard to technology, gains often occur because inaccessible media systems neces-sitate adaptations; examples include closed captioning (sound-to-text translation) and telephone relay services. Deaf communities also produce their own “minor” media. Deaf Space, for instance, refers to architecture designed specifically for inhabitants who sign and, to a lesser extent, use personal amplification devices.1 For scientists and engineers, deafness has yielded insights into the elements of speech and hearing, as well as pos-sibilities for their reconfiguration: new techniques for sound synthesis and visualization, for instance, or new modes of listening.Definitions of deafness have varied across time and national context, the net trend being the expansion of the category and the diversification of allied identities. Deafness did not become an object of scientific in-vestigation and pedagogical intervention in Europe until the early mod-ern period. Before the 1500s, congenitally deaf individuals and families were highly isolated. In the absence of amplification devices and precise
© 2020 Duke University Press, Durham, USA

[4] Mara MillsdeafnessA deaf spectrum—or “deafnesses”—has replaced the deaf/hearing binary in both the biomedical and cultural realms. At the same time, audiometric categories of hearing impairment do not map neatly onto deaf identities. Depending on technology use and community affiliation, individuals with audiograms that register similar types of impairment might identify quite differently as Deaf (a cultural group defined by sign language use), deaf, late-deafened, deaf-blind, hearing, or hard of hearing. Deafness may be used colloquially to designate any kind of hearing difference; however, members of Deaf culture often reject the term as itself pathologizing.In addition, Deaf scholars have reconceived hearing loss as deaf gain to ac-count for the new representations, communities, and forms of cognition afforded by bodily and communicative difference (Bauman and Murray 2009). These gains range from the neurodiversity that accompanies visual-gestural languages to aesthetic and technical innovations. With regard to technology, gains often occur because inaccessible media systems neces-sitate adaptations; examples include closed captioning (sound-to-text translation) and telephone relay services. Deaf communities also produce their own “minor” media. Deaf Space, for instance, refers to architecture designed specifically for inhabitants who sign and, to a lesser extent, use personal amplification devices.1 For scientists and engineers, deafness has yielded insights into the elements of speech and hearing, as well as pos-sibilities for their reconfiguration: new techniques for sound synthesis and visualization, for instance, or new modes of listening.Definitions of deafness have varied across time and national context, the net trend being the expansion of the category and the diversification of allied identities. Deafness did not become an object of scientific in-vestigation and pedagogical intervention in Europe until the early mod-ern period. Before the 1500s, congenitally deaf individuals and families were highly isolated. In the absence of amplification devices and precise
© 2020 Duke University Press, Durham, USA
Heruntergeladen am 24.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780822375494-005/html?lang=de&srsltid=AfmBOoo_IYPZ7a72kQrKM9di_-6BeRvMrr2uBpjdv78GwwuSJnLUdtWo
Button zum nach oben scrollen