Startseite Sozialwissenschaften Decision-Makers in the Dock: How Trials, Human Rights Advocacy and International Law are Shaping the Justice Norm
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Decision-Makers in the Dock: How Trials, Human Rights Advocacy and International Law are Shaping the Justice Norm

  • Carrie Booth Walling
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Dezember 2012

Abstract

The mid-1980s marks the start of what has become a rapid shift towards new norms and practices of providing more accountability for human rights violations through the use of trials. This dramatic increase in human rights prosecutions is the direct result of the activism of the human rights movement. The increase in trials in turn has aided the development of international criminal law and has promoted the formal institutionalization of new accountability standards for international organizations. This article traces the emergence and diffusion of the justice norm. Then using two sets of case studies it examines how international law and human rights activism have interacted to create new opportunities for domestic prosecution in Argentina and the process through which the United Nations came to adopt formal standards on prosecutions and amnesties


I would like to thank Raymond Grew and Robert Donia for the invitation to participate in the Law and Human Rights in Global History Conference at the University of Michigan and all of the participants for their thoughtful and engaging comments on this work. I especially thank Steve Ratner and John Ciorciari for very helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper and David A. Reimann for his invaluable assistance analyzing the data. I thank Hun Joon Kim and Kathryn Sikkink for their permission to use the Human Rights Prosecutions data set for this analysis. Replication data can be found at: http://www.griffith.edu.au/professionalpage/ hun-joon-kim/human-rights-prosecution-database or http://www.polisci.umn.edu/people/ profile.php?UID=sikkink. I also thank Leigh A. Payne and Kathryn Sikkink for permission to use their Transitional Justice data set and Geoff Dancy and Megan Johnson for their assistance with the data. The Transitional Justice data set is funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 096122. Any opinions, conclusions and findings expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Replication data is available at: transitionaljusticedata.com. Part three of this article draws on work previously published in Kathryn Sikkink and Carrie Booth Walling “Argentina’s Contribution to Global Trends in Transitional Justice,” in Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Javier Mariezcurrena (eds.) Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 301-324.

Published Online: 2012-12-08

© 2012 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Heruntergeladen am 6.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/1940-0004.1181/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen