Interactive Prosodic Marking of Focus, Boundary and Newness in Mandarin

References

1 Alku P, Vintturi J, Vilkman E (2002): Measuring the effect of fundamental frequency raising as a strategy for increasing vocal intensity in soft, normal and loud phonation. Speech Commun 38:321-334.10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00072-3Suche in Google Scholar

2 Allbritton DW, McKoon G, Ratcliff R (1996): Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. J Exp Psychol Learn 22:714-735.10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.714 Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Baumann S, Becker J, Grice M, Mücke D (2007): Tonal and articulatory marking of focus in German. 16th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Saarbrücken, pp 1029-1032.Suche in Google Scholar

4 Baumann S, Hadelich K (2003): Accent type and givenness: an experimen t with auditory and visual priming. 15th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Barcelona, pp 1811-1814.Suche in Google Scholar

5 Beckman ME (1996): The parsing of prosody. Lang Cognitive Proc 11:17-67.10.1080/016909696387213Suche in Google Scholar

6 Beckman ME, Pierrehumbert J (1986): Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonol Yearb 3:255-309.10.1017/S095267570000066XSuche in Google Scholar

7 Boersma P, Weenink D (2005): Praat: doing phonetics by computer. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Suche in Google Scholar

8 Bolinger DL (1958): Intonation and grammar. Lang Lear 8:31-37.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1958.tb01214.xSuche in Google Scholar

9 Bolinger DL (1972): Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader). Language 48:633-644.10.2307/412039Suche in Google Scholar

10 Botinis A, Fourakis M, Gawronska B (1999): Focus identification in English, Greek and Swedish. 14th Int Congr Phonet Sci, San Francisco, pp 1557-1560.Suche in Google Scholar

11 Brown G (1983): Prosodic structure and given/new distinction; in Cutler A, Ladd DR (eds): Prosody: Models and Measurements. Berlin, Springer, pp 67-77.10.1007/978-3-642-69103-4_6Suche in Google Scholar

12 Bruce G (1983): Accentuation and timing in Swedish. Folia Linguist 17:221-238.10.1515/flin.1983.17.1-4.221Suche in Google Scholar

13 Chafe WL (1974): Language and consciousness. Language 50:111-133.10.2307/412014Suche in Google Scholar

14 Chafe WL (1976): Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subject, topics, and point of view; in Li CN (ed): Subject and Topic. New York, Academic Press, pp 25-53.Suche in Google Scholar

15 Chen L, Wang L, Yang Y (2014): Distinguish between focus and newness: an ERP study. J Neurolinguist 31:28-41.10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.06.002Suche in Google Scholar

16 Chen YY (2004): Focus and intonational phrase boundary in standard Chinese. IEEE Int Symp Chinese Spok Lang Processing (ISCSLP 2004), pp 41-44.10.1109/CHINSL.2004.1409581Suche in Google Scholar

17 Chen Y-Y, Gussenhoven C (2008): Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. J Phon 36:724-746.10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.003Suche in Google Scholar

18 Chen Y-Y, Xu Y (2006): Production of weak elements in speech - evidence from F0 patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica 63:47-75.10.1159/000091406Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19 Cho T, Keating PA (2001): Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. J Phon 29:155-190.10.1006/jpho.2001.0131Suche in Google Scholar

20 Cho T, McQueen JM, Cox EA (2007): Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: the case of domaininitial strengthening in English. J Phon 35:210-243.10.1016/j.wocn.2006.03.003Suche in Google Scholar

21 Cooper WE, Eady SJ, Mueller PR (1985): Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. J Acoust Soc Am 77:2142-2156.10.1121/1.392372Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22 Cruttenden A (1997): Intonation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166973Suche in Google Scholar

23 De Jong KJ (1995): The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. J Acoust Soc Am 97:491-504.10.1121/1.412275Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24 De Pijper JR, Sandeman AA (1994): On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. J Acoust Soc Am 96:2037-2047.10.1121/1.410145Suche in Google Scholar

25 Dilley L, Shattuck-Hufnagel S, Ostendorf M (1996): Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. J Phon 24:423-444.10.1006/jpho.1996.0023Suche in Google Scholar

26 Duez D (1982): Silent and non-silent pauses in three speech styles. Lang Speech 25:11-28.10.1177/002383098202500102Suche in Google Scholar

27 Eady SJ, Cooper WE (1986): Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. J Acoust Soc Am 80:402-415.10.1121/1.394091Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28 Fant G, Kruckenberg A (1996): Quantal theory of speech timing. Speech, music and status report. Fonetik 96:41-44.Suche in Google Scholar

29 Féry C, Kügler F (2008): Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. J Phon 36:680-703.10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

30 Féry C, Samek-Lodovici V (2006): Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82:131-150.10.1353/lan.2006.0031Suche in Google Scholar

31 Fougeron C (2001): Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. J Phon 29:109-135.10.1006/jpho.2000.0114Suche in Google Scholar

32 Fougeron C, Keating PA (1997): Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. J Acoust Soc Am 101:3728-3740.10.1121/1.418332Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33 Fowler C, Housum J (1987): Talkers' signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. J Mem Lang 26:489-504.10.1016/0749-596X(87)90136-7Suche in Google Scholar

34 Grosz B, Hirschberg J (1992): Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. 2nd Int Conf Spoken Lang Processing (ICSLP), Alberta, pp 429-432.10.21437/ICSLP.1992-103Suche in Google Scholar

35 Gussenhoven C (2007): Types of focus in English; in Lee C, Gordon M, Büring D (eds): Topic and Focus: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation. Dordrecht, Springer, pp 83-100.10.1007/978-1-4020-4796-1_5Suche in Google Scholar

36 Halliday MAK (1967): Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part II. J Linguist 3:199-244.10.1017/S0022226700001882Suche in Google Scholar

37 Hanssen J, Peters J, Gussenhoven C (2008): Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives. 4th Int Conf Speech Prosody, Campinas, pp 609-612.Suche in Google Scholar

38 He X, Hanssen J, van Heuven VJ, Gussenhoven C (2011): Phonetic implementation must be learnt: native versus Chinese realization of focus accent in Dutch. 17th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Hong Kong, pp 843-846.Suche in Google Scholar

39 Hirschberg J (1993): Pitch accent in context: predicting intonational prominence from text. Artif Intell 63:305-340.10.1016/0004-3702(93)90020-CSuche in Google Scholar

40 Horne M, Strangert E, Heldner M (1995): Prosodic boundary strength in Swedish: final lengthening and silent interval duration. 13th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Stockholm, pp 170-173.Suche in Google Scholar

41 House J, Sityaev D (2003): Phonetic and phonological correlates of broad, narrow and contrastive focus in English. 15th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Barcelona, pp 1819-1822.Suche in Google Scholar

42 Hwang HK (2012): Asymmetries between production, perception and comprehension of focus types in Japanese; in Ma Q, Ding H, Hirst D (eds): Speech Prosody 2012, Shanghai, pp 641-644.Suche in Google Scholar

43 Ipek C (2011): Phonetic realization of focus with no on-focus pitch range expansion in Turkish. 17th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Hong Kong, pp 140-143.Suche in Google Scholar

44 Ipek C, Jun S-A (2013): Towards a model of intonational phonology of Turkish: neutral intonation. J Acoust Soc Am 133:3573.10.1121/1.4806553Suche in Google Scholar

45 Ishihara S (2002): Intonation of wh-questions in Japanese and its influence on syntax; in Otsu Y (ed): Linguistics and Phonetics 2002. Urayasu, Meikai University, pp 165-189.Suche in Google Scholar

46 Ishihara S (2011): Japanese focus prosody revisited: freeing focus from prosodic phrasing. Lingua 121:1870-1889.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.008Suche in Google Scholar

47 Ito J, Mester A (2013): Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124:20-40.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.016Suche in Google Scholar

48 Jeon H-S, Nolan F (2013): The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean. J Acoust Soc Am 133:3039-3049.10.1121/1.4798663Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

49 Jun S-A (1993): The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody; PhD thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.Suche in Google Scholar

50 Katz J, Selkirk E (2011): Contrastive focus vs discourse-new: evidence from phonetic prominence in English. Language 87:771-816.10.1353/lan.2011.0076Suche in Google Scholar

51 Katz WF, Beach CM, Jenouri K, Verma S (1996): Duration and fundamental frequency correlates of phrase boundaries in productions by children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 99:3179-3191.10.1121/1.414802Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

52 Keating PA, Cho T, Fougeron C, Hsu C-S (2003): Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. Lab Phonol 6:145-163.Suche in Google Scholar

53 Kochanski G, Grabe E, Coleman J, Rosner B (2005): Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. J Acoust Soc Am 118:1038-1054.10.1121/1.1923349Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

54 Krifka M (2008): Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguist Hung 55:243-276.10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2Suche in Google Scholar

55 Krivokapic J, Byrd D (2012): Prosodic boundary strength: an articulatory and perceptual study. J Phon 40:430-442.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

56 Kubozono H (1993): The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Tokyo, Kurosio Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

57 Kubozono H (2007): Focus and intonation in Japanese: does focus trigger pitch reset. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (Working Papers of the SFB 632) 9:1-27.Suche in Google Scholar

58 Kügler F, Ganzel S (2014): On the elicitation of focus - prosodic differences as a function of sentence mode of the context? 4th Int Symp Tonal Aspects of Lang (TAL), Nijmegen, pp 71-74.Suche in Google Scholar

59 Ladd DR (1988): Declination “reset” and the hierarchical organization of utterances. J Acoust Soc Am 84:530-544.10.1121/1.396830Suche in Google Scholar

60 Ladd DR (2008): Intonational Phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808814Suche in Google Scholar

61 Ladd DR, Campbell N (1991): Theories of prosodic structure: evidence from syllable duration. 12th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Aix-en-Provence, pp 290-293.Suche in Google Scholar

62 Ladd R (1996): Intonational Phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808814Suche in Google Scholar

63 Lee A, Xu Y (2012): Revisiting focus prosody in Japanese. Speech Prosody 2012, Shanghai, pp 274-277.Suche in Google Scholar

64 Lee Y-C, Xu Y (2010): Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean. Speech Prosody, Chicago, pp 100031-100034.Suche in Google Scholar

65 Lehiste I (1973): Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa 7:107-122.10.1121/1.1982702Suche in Google Scholar

66 Lehiste I, Olive JP, Streeter LA (1976): Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. J Acoust Soc Am 60:1199-1202.10.1121/1.381180Suche in Google Scholar

67 Liberman M, Pierrehumbert J (1984): Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length; in Aronoff M, Oehrle RT (eds): Language Sound Structure. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 157-233.Suche in Google Scholar

68 Lieberman P (1967): Intonation, Perception, and Language. MIT Research Monograph 38. Cambridge, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

69 Liu F, Xu Y (2005): Parallel encoding of focus and interrogative meaning in Mandarin intonation. Phonetica 62:70-87.10.1159/000090090Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

70 Liu F, Xu Y, Prom-on S, Yu ACL (2013): Morpheme-like prosodic functions: evidence from acoustic analysis and computational modeling. J Speech Sci 3:85-140.Suche in Google Scholar

71 Nagahara H (1994): Phonological Phrasing in Japanese; PhD thesis, UCLA, Los Angeles.Suche in Google Scholar

72 Nespor M, Vogel I (1986): Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht, Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

73 Nooteboom SG, Kruyt JG (1987): Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: an experiment. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1512-1523.10.1121/1.2024349Suche in Google Scholar

74 Nooteboom SG, Terken J (1982): What makes speakers omit pitch accents? An experiment. Phonetica 39:317-336.10.1159/000261670Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

75 O'Connor JD, Arnold GF (1961): Intonation of Colloquial English. London, Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

76 Oller DK (1973): The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. J Acoust Soc Am 54:1235-1247.10.1121/1.1914393Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

77 Palmer HE (1922): English Intonation with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge, Heffer.Suche in Google Scholar

78 Pell MD (2001): Influence of emotion and focus on prosody in matched statements and questions. J Acoust Soc Am 109:1668-1680.10.1121/1.1352088Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

79 Pierrehumbert J (1980): The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Cambridge, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

80 Pierrehumbert J, Hirschberg J (1990): The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse; in Cohen PR, Morgan JL, Pollack ME (eds): Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 271-311.Suche in Google Scholar

81 Pierrehumbert JB, Beckman ME (1988): Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

82 Price P (1991): The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2956-2979.10.1121/1.401770Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

83 Prince EF (1981): Toward a taxonomy of given-new information; in Cole P (ed): Radical Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press, pp 223-255.Suche in Google Scholar

84 Prince EF (1992): The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness and information-status; in Mann WC, Thompson SA (eds): Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund Raising Text. Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp 295-325.10.1075/pbns.16.12priSuche in Google Scholar

85 Prom-on S, Xu Y, Thipakorn B (2009): Modeling tone and intonation in Mandarin and English as a process of target approximation. J Acoust Soc Am 125:405-424.10.1121/1.3037222Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

86 Rump HH, Collier R (1996): Focus conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Lang Speech 39:1-17.10.1177/002383099603900101Suche in Google Scholar

87 Sahkai H, Kalvik M-L, Mihkla M (2013): Prosody of contrastive focus in Estonian. 14th Interspeech, Lyon, pp315-319.10.21437/Interspeech.2013-91Suche in Google Scholar

88 Selkirk E (1986): On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonol Yearb 3:371-405.10.1017/s0952675700000695Suche in Google Scholar

89 Selkirk E (2002): Contrastive focus vs presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English; in Bel B, Marlin I (eds): Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence. Aix-en-Provence, Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Université de Provence, pp 643-646.Suche in Google Scholar

90 Selkirk E (2005): Comments on intonational phrasing in English; in Frota, Sonia, Marina Vigário, and Maria João Freitas, (eds): Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian languages. Vol. 9. Walter de Gruyter, 2005. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 11-58.Suche in Google Scholar

91 Selkirk E (2008): Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”. Acta Linguist Hung 55:331-346.10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.8Suche in Google Scholar

92 Selkirk E (2011): The syntax-phonology interface; in Goldsmith JA, Riggle J, Yu ACL (eds): The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed 2. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, pp 435-484.Suche in Google Scholar

93 Selkirk E, Shinya T, Kawahara S (2004): Phonological and phonetic effects of minor phrase length on f0 in Japanese. 2nd Int Conf Speech Prosody, Nara, pp 345-348.Suche in Google Scholar

94 Shannon CE (1948): A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech J 27:379-423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSuche in Google Scholar

95 Sugahara M (2005): Post-focus prosodic phrase boundaries in Tokyo Japanese: asymmetric behavior of an f0 cue and domain-final lengthening. Stud Linguist 59:144-173.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00124.xSuche in Google Scholar

96 Swerts M (1994): Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Lang Speech 37:21-34.10.1177/002383099403700102Suche in Google Scholar

97 Swerts M (1997): Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. J Acoust Soc Am 101:514-521.10.1121/1.418114Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

98 Swerts M (1998): Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. J Pragmat 30:485-496.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00014-9Suche in Google Scholar

99 Swerts M, Geluykens R (1994): Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Lang Speech 37:21-43.10.1177/002383099403700102Suche in Google Scholar

100 Swerts M, Krahmer E, Avesani C (2002): Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis. J Phon 30:629-654.10.1006/jpho.2002.0178Suche in Google Scholar

101 Swerts M, Strangert E, Heldner M (1996): F0 declination in spontaneous and read-aloud speech. Int Conf Spoken Lang Processing (ICSLP), Philadelphia, pp 1501-1504.10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607901Suche in Google Scholar

102 Terken J (1984): The distribution of pitch accents in instructions as a function of discourse structure. Lang Speech 27:269-289.10.1177/002383098402700306Suche in Google Scholar

103 Terken J, Hirschberg J (1994): Deaccentuation of words representing “given” information: effects of persistence of grammatical function and surface position. Lang Speech 37:125-145.10.1177/002383099403700202Suche in Google Scholar

104 Turk AE, Shattuck-Hufnagel S (2007): Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. J Phon 35:445-472.10.1016/j.wocn.2006.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

105 Umeda N (1982): “F0 declination” is situation dependent. J Phon 10:279-290.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30989-1Suche in Google Scholar

106 Vainio M, Mixdorff H, Järvikivi J, Werner S (2003): The production and perception of focus in Finnish. 15th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Barcelona, pp 1831-1834.Suche in Google Scholar

107 Wagner M (2005): Prosody and Recursion; PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

108 Wang B, Féry C (2012): Prosodic encoding of topic and focus and its influence on speech perception in split sentences of Chinese Putonghua. Chin J Acoust 31:101-112.Suche in Google Scholar

109 Wang B, Xu Y (2011): Differential prosodic encoding of topic and focus in sentence-initial position in Mandarin Chinese. J Phon 39:595-611.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

110 Wang B, Xu Y, Xu J (2011): Prosodic realization of discourse topic in Mandarin Chinese: comparing professional with non-professional speakers. 17th Int Congr Phonet Sci, Hong Kong, pp 17-21.Suche in Google Scholar

111 Wang L, Wang B, Xu Y (2012): Prosodic encoding and perception of focus in Tibetan (Anduo dialect). 6th Speech Prosody, Shanghai, pp 286-289.Suche in Google Scholar

112 Wells JC (2006): English Intonation PB and Audio CD: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

113 Wightman CW, Shattuck-Hufnagel S, Ostendorf M, Price PJ (1992): Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1707-1717.10.1121/1.402450Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

114 Xu Y (1999): Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. J Phon 27:55-105.10.1006/jpho.1999.0086Suche in Google Scholar

115 Xu Y (2005): Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Commun 46:220-251.10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.014Suche in Google Scholar

116 Xu Y: ProsodyPro - A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis; Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), pp 7-10. (Aix-en-Provence, France 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

117 Xu Y (2009): Timing and coordination in tone and intonation - an articulatory-functional perspective. Lingua 119:906-927.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.015Suche in Google Scholar

118 Xu Y, Chen S-W, Wang B (2012): Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression (PFC): a typological divide within the same language family? Linguist Rev 29:131-147.10.1515/tlr-2012-0006Suche in Google Scholar

119 Xu Y, Wang ML (2009): Organizing syllables into groups - evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin. J Phon 37:502-520.10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

120 Xu Y, Xu CX (2005): Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. J Phon 33:159-197.10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

121 Zhang XX, Wang B, Wu Q (2012): Prosodic realization of focus in statement and question of Tibetan. 13th Interspeech, Portland, pp 667-670.10.21437/Interspeech.2012-205Suche in Google Scholar