Perspectives on Speech Timing: Coupled Oscillator Modeling of Polish and Finnish

References

1 Abercrombie D (1973): A phonetician's view of verse structure; in Phonetics in Linguistics. London, Longman's Publishing Group.Suche in Google Scholar

2 Abraham RH, Shaw CD (2000): Dynamics: The Geometry of Behavior, ed 4. Aerial Press.Suche in Google Scholar

3 Aylett M, Turk A (2004): The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Lang Speech 47(pt 1):31-56.10.1177/00238309040470010201Suche in Google Scholar

4 Aylett M, Turk A (2006): Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. J Acoust Soc Am 119(5 pt 1):3048-3058.10.1121/1.2188331Suche in Google Scholar

5 Barbosa PA (2006): Incursões em torno do ritmo da fala [Investigations of speech rhythm]. Campinas, Pontes.Suche in Google Scholar

6 Barbosa PA (2007): From syntax to acoustic duration: a dynamical model of speech rhythm production. Speech Commun 49:725-742.10.1016/j.specom.2007.04.013Suche in Google Scholar

7 Beckman ME (1992): Evidence for speech rhythms across languages; in Tohkura Y, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Sagisaka Y (eds): Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure. Tokyo, OHM Publishing Co., pp 457-463.Suche in Google Scholar

8 Bertinetto PM, Bertini C (2010): Towards a unified predictive model of natural language rhythm; in Russo M (ed): Prosodic Universals: Comparative Studies in Rhythmic Modeling and Rhythm Typology. Naples, Aracne, pp 43-78.Suche in Google Scholar

9 Bolinger DLM (1965): Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

10 Bouzon C, Hirst D (2004): Isochrony and prosodic structure in British English. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Nara, pp 223-226.Suche in Google Scholar

11 Brady MC, Port RF (2007): Quantifying vowel onset periodicity in Japanese. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, pp 337-342.Suche in Google Scholar

12 Browman CP, Goldstein L (1992): Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49:155-180.10.1159/000261913Suche in Google Scholar

13 Cetnarowska B (2000): On the (non-)recursivity of the prosodic word in Polish. ZAS Papers Linguist 19:1-21.10.21248/zaspil.19.2000.66Suche in Google Scholar

14 Cummins F (2011): Periodic and aperiodic synchronization in skilled action. Front Hum Neurosci 170.10.3389/fnhum.2011.00170Suche in Google Scholar

15 Cummins F, Port R (1998): Rhythmic constraints on English stress timing. J Phon 26:145-171.10.1006/jpho.1998.0070Suche in Google Scholar

16 Cutler A (1994): The perception of rhythm in language. Cognition 50:79-81.10.1016/0010-0277(94)90021-3Suche in Google Scholar

17 De Jong K (1995): The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. J Acoust Soc Am 97:491-504.10.1121/1.412275Suche in Google Scholar

18 Dellwo V, Steiner I, Aschenberner B, Dankovicova J, Wagner P (2004): BonnTempo-corpus and BonnTempo-tools: a database for the study of speech rhythm and rate. Proceedings of INTERSPEECH, Jeju, pp 777-780.10.21437/Interspeech.2004-294Suche in Google Scholar

19 Dellwo V, Wagner P (2003): Relations between language rhythm and speech rate. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp 471-474.Suche in Google Scholar

20 Dłuska M (1950): Fonetyka polska [The phonetics of Polish]. PWN Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.Suche in Google Scholar

21 Dogil G (1979): Autosegmental Account of Phonological Emphasis. Carbondale, Illinois and Edmonton, Canada, Linguistic Research. Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

22 Eriksson A (1991): Aspects of Swedish Speech Rhythm; PhD thesis, University of Göteborg.Suche in Google Scholar

23 Fowler CA (1980): Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. J Phon 8:113-133.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31446-9Suche in Google Scholar

24 Gahl S, Yao Y, Johnson K (2012): Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. J Mem Lang 66:789-806.10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006Suche in Google Scholar

25 Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004): Bayesian Data Analysis, ed 2. Boca Raton, FL, Chapman & Hall/CRC.10.1201/9780429258480Suche in Google Scholar

26 Gelman A, Hill J (2007): Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790942Suche in Google Scholar

27 Gibson JJ (1975): Events are perceivable but time is not; in Fraser JT, Lawrence N (eds): The Study of Time II: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the International Society for the Study of Time, Lake Yamanaka-Japan. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 295-301.Suche in Google Scholar

28 Gordon M (2011): Stress systems; in Goldsmith J, Riggle J, Yu AC (eds): The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed 2. Chichester, Wiley Blackwell, pp 141-163.Suche in Google Scholar

29 Hanson K, Kiparsky P (1996): A parametric theory of poetic meter. Language 72:287-335.10.2307/416652Suche in Google Scholar

30 Hayes B (1980): A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules; PhD thesis, Cambridge, MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

31 Hayes B, Puppel S (1985): On the rhythm rule in Polish; in van der Hulst H, Smith N (eds): Advances in Nonlinear Phonology. Dordrecht, Foris Publications, pp 59-81.Suche in Google Scholar

32 Hualde JI, Nadeu M (2014): Rhetorical stress in Spanish; in van der Hulst H (ed): Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p 228.Suche in Google Scholar

33 Jaeger TF, Buz E (2016): Signal reduction and linguistic encoding; in Fernández EM, Cairns HS (eds): Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118829516.ch3Suche in Google Scholar

34 Jassem W, Hill DR, Witten IH (1984): Isochrony in English speech: its statistical validity and linguistic relevance; in Gibbon D, Richter H (eds): Intonation, Accent and Rhythm: Studies in Discourse Phonology. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp 203-225.Suche in Google Scholar

35 Jones MR, Boltz M (1989): Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol Rev 96:459-491.10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.459Suche in Google Scholar

36 Kelso JAS (1995): Dynamic patterns: the self organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

37 Kim H, Cole J (2005): The stress foot as a unit of planned timing: evidence from shortening in the prosodic phrase. Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2005, Lisbon, pp 2365-2368.10.21437/Interspeech.2005-37Suche in Google Scholar

38 Kochanski G, Loukina, A, Keane E, Shih C, Rosner B (2010): Long-range prosody prediction and rhythm. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Chicago, IL, pp 1-4.Suche in Google Scholar

39 Kopell N (1988): Toward a theory of modelling central pattern generators; in Cohen AH, Rossignol S, Grillner S (eds): Neural Control of Rhythmic Movements in Vertebrates. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp 369-413.Suche in Google Scholar

40 Kuperman V, Ernestus M, Baayen H (2008): Frequency distributions of uniphones, diphones, and triphones in spontaneous speech. J Acoust Soc Am 124:3897-3908.10.1121/1.3006378Suche in Google Scholar

41 Lee MW, Gibbons J (2007): Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding. Cognition 105:446-456.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.013Suche in Google Scholar

42 Lehiste I (1977): Isochrony reconsidered. J Phon 5:253-263.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31139-8Suche in Google Scholar

43 Lehtonen J (1970): Aspects of Quantity in Standard Finnish. No. VI in Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia. Jyväskylä, University of Jyväskylä.Suche in Google Scholar

44 Liberman M, Prince A (1977): On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguist Inq 8:249-336.Suche in Google Scholar

45 Lindblom B (1990): Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory; in Marchal A (ed): Speech Production and Speech Modeling. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Suche in Google Scholar

46 Louwerse MM, Dale R, Bard EG, Jeuniaux P (2012): Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn Sci 36:1404-1426.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.xSuche in Google Scholar

47 Malisz Z (2011): Tempo differentiated analyses of timing in Polish. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, pp 1322-1325.Suche in Google Scholar

48 Malisz Z (2013): Speech Rhythm Variability in Polish and English: A Study of Interaction between Rhythmic Levels; PhD thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Suche in Google Scholar

49 Malisz Z, Zygis M, Pompino-Marschall B (2013): Rhythmic structure effects on glottalisation: a study of different speech styles in Polish and German. Lab Phonol 4:119-158.10.1515/lp-2013-0006Suche in Google Scholar

50 McAuley JD, Fromboluti EK (2014): Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130401.10.1098/rstb.2013.0401Suche in Google Scholar

51 Newlin-Łukowicz L (2012): Polish stress: looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system. Phonology 29:271-329.10.1017/S0952675712000139Suche in Google Scholar

52 Nolan F, Jeon HS (2014): Speech rhythm: a metaphor? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130396.10.1098/rstb.2013.0396Suche in Google Scholar

53 Ntzoufras I (2002): Gibbs variable selection using BUGS. J Stat Softw 7:1-19.10.18637/jss.v007.i07Suche in Google Scholar

54 O'Dell M, Lennes M, Nieminen T (2008): Hierarchical levels of rhythm in conversational speech. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Campinas, pp 355-358.Suche in Google Scholar

55 O'Dell M, Lennes M, Werner S, Nieminen T (2007): Looking for rhythms in conversational speech. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, pp 1201-1204.Suche in Google Scholar

56 O'Dell M, Nieminen T (1998): Reasons for an underlying unity in rhythm dichotomy. Linguistica Uralica 3:178-185.Suche in Google Scholar

57 O'Dell M, Nieminen T (2002): How long is a stress group? Cadernos de Estudos. Lingüísticos 43:93-108.Suche in Google Scholar

58 O'Dell M, Nieminen T (2006): Tahdin ajoitus suomessa oskillaattorimallin näkökulmasta [Timing of feet in Finnish from an oscillator model perspective]; in Aulanko R, Wahlberg L, Vainio M (eds): Fonetiikan päivät 2006 [The Phonetics Symposium 2006]. No. 53 in Helsingin Yliopiston Puhetieteiden Laitoksen Julkaisuja, pp 134-143.Suche in Google Scholar

59 O'Dell ML (2003): Intrinsic Timing and Quantity in Finnish; PhD thesis, University of Tampere.Suche in Google Scholar

60 O'Dell ML, Nieminen T (1999): Coupled oscillator model of speech rhythm. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, pp 1075-1078.Suche in Google Scholar

61 O'Dell ML, Nieminen T (2009): Coupled oscillator model for speech timing: overview and examples. Nordic Prosody: Proceedings of the 10th Conference, Helsinki, pp 179-190.Suche in Google Scholar

62 O'Dell ML, Nieminen T, Mustanoja L (2011): The effect of synchronous reading on speech rhythm. Presented at the 13th International Rhythm Perception and Production Workshop, Leipzig.Suche in Google Scholar

63 Pate JK, Goldwater S (2015): Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. J Mem Lang 78:1-17.10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

64 Pellegrino F, Coupé C, Marsico E (2011): A cross-language perspective on speech information rate. Language 87:539-558.10.1353/lan.2011.0057Suche in Google Scholar

65 Perkell JS, Klatt DH (1986): Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

66 Port R (2013): Coordinative structures for the control of speech production. www.cs.indiana.edu/∼port/teach/641/coord.strctr.html (last checked April 1, 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

67 Port R, Tajima K, Cummins F (1999): Speech and rhythmic behavior; in Savelsburgh GJP, van der Maas H, van Geert PCL (eds): The Non-Linear Analysis of Developmental Processes. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 5-45.Suche in Google Scholar

68 Port RF, Leary AP (2005): Against formal phonology. Language 81:927-964.10.1353/lan.2005.0195Suche in Google Scholar

69 Port RF, Van Gelder T (1995): Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

70 Quené H, Port RF (2005): Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception. Phonetica 62:1-13.10.1159/000087222Suche in Google Scholar

71 Rubach J, Booij G (1985): A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66:281-319.10.1016/0024-3841(85)90032-4Suche in Google Scholar

72 Sadeniemi M (1949): Metriikkamme perusteet [Foundations of our metrics]. No. 236 in SKS:n toimituksia. Helsinki, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Suche in Google Scholar

73 Schlink B (1994): Selbs Betrug. Zürich, Diogenes Verlag AG.Suche in Google Scholar

74 Schlüter J (2005): Rhythmic Grammar. The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English, Volume 46 of Topics in English Linguistics. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219265Suche in Google Scholar

75 Seyfarth S (2014): Word informativity influences acoustic duration: effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition 133:140-155.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013Suche in Google Scholar

76 Shannon CE (1948): A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical J 27:379-423, 623-656.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.xSuche in Google Scholar

77 Shih SS (2014): Towards Optimal Rhythm; PhD thesis, Stanford University.Suche in Google Scholar

78 Shockley K, Richardson DC, Dale R (2009): Conversation and coordinative structures. Top Cogn Sci 1:305-319.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.xSuche in Google Scholar

79 Sievers E (1893): Grundzüge der Phonetik zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der Indogermanischen Sprachen, ed 4. Leipzig, Breitkopf & Härtel.Suche in Google Scholar

80 Sovijärvi A (1946): Huomioita puherytmiikasta [Notes on speech rhythm]. Virittäjä 50:117-129.Suche in Google Scholar

81 Temperley D (2009): Distributional stress regularity: a corpus study. J psycholinguist Res 38:75-92.10.1007/s10936-008-9084-0Suche in Google Scholar

82 Tilsen S (2011): Metrical regularity facilitates speech planning and production. Lab Phonol 2:185-218.10.1515/labphon.2011.006Suche in Google Scholar

83 Turk A (2010): Does prosodic constituency signal relative predictability? A smooth signal redundancy hypothesis. Lab Phonol 1:227-262.10.1515/labphon.2010.012Suche in Google Scholar

84 Turk A, Shattuck-Hufnagel S (2013): What is speech rhythm? A commentary on Arvaniti and Rodriquez, Krivokapic and Goswami and Leong. Lab Phonol 4:93-118.10.1515/lp-2013-0005Suche in Google Scholar

85 Turk A, Shattuck-Hufnagel S (2014): Timing in talking: what is it used for, and how is it controlled? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 369:20130395.10.1098/rstb.2013.0395Suche in Google Scholar

86 Turvey MT (1990): Coordination. Am Psychol 45:938-953.10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.938Suche in Google Scholar

87 van der Hulst H (2014): Representing rhythm; in van der Hulst H (ed): Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p 325.Suche in Google Scholar

88 Vogel R, van de Vijver R, Kotz S, Kutscher A, Wagner P (2015): Function words in rhythmic optimisation; in van de Vijver R, Vogel R (eds): Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar: A Germanic Perspective. Berlin, De Gruyter, pp 253-274.Suche in Google Scholar

89 Wagner P (2012): Meter specific timing and prominence in German poetry and prose; in Niebuhr·(ed): Understanding Prosody, Language, Context and Cognition. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp 219-236.Suche in Google Scholar

90 Wagner P, Malisz Z, Inden B, Wachsmuth I (2013): Interaction phonology - a temporal co-ordination component enabling representational alignment within a model of communication. Alignment in Communication. Towards a New Theory of Communication, pp 109-132.10.1075/ais.6.06wagSuche in Google Scholar

91 Wheeldon LR, Lahiri A (2002): The minimal unit of phonological encoding: prosodic or lexical word. Cognition 85:B31-B41.Suche in Google Scholar

92 White L (2014): Communicative function and prosodic form in speech timing. Speech Commun 63:38-54.10.1016/j.specom.2014.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

93 Windmann A, Šimko J, Wagner P (2014a): Probing theories of speech timing using optimization modeling. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, pp 346-350.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-57Suche in Google Scholar

94 Windmann A, Šimko J, Wagner P (2014b): A unified account of prominence effects in an optimization-based model of speech timing. Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2014, Singapore.10.21437/Interspeech.2014-44Suche in Google Scholar

95 Windmann A, Šimko J, Wagner P (2015): Optimization-based modeling of speech timing. Speech Commun 74:76-92.10.1016/j.specom.2015.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

96 Zipf GK (1935): The Psycho-Biology of Language. Houghton, Mifflin.Suche in Google Scholar