Abstract
Aims: This study investigates the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts by 54 early Spanish-Galician bilinguals in the cities of Vigo and Santiago (Galicia, Spain). Empirical data is provided to examine the role of language dominance in the perception and production of Galician mid vowel contrasts in order to determine whether the Galician vowel system is becoming more Spanish-like as a result of extensive contact with Spanish in urban areas. Methods: Perception and production data for each mid vowel contrast were collected in (1) binary forced-choice identification tasks, (2) AX discrimination tasks and (3) a reading-aloud task. Results: Results from binary forced-choice identification and AX discrimination tasks indicate that Spanish-dominant bilinguals have great difficulty in discriminating between these mid vowels while Galician-dominant subjects display a robust categorical identification of the two mid vowel categories. Acoustic analyses of their productions show that Galician-dominant bilinguals implement a Galician-specific /e/-/ɛ/ contrast but Spanish-dominant ones produce a single, merged Spanish-like front mid vowel. However, both language dominance groups seem to maintain a more robust /o/-/ɔ/ contrast. This asymmetry between front and back mid vowels is found in the productions of both language dominance groups. Conclusion: These results show that language dominance is a strong predictor of the production and perception abilities of Spanish-Galician bilinguals, and that only Galician-dominant subjects in these urban areas possess two independent phonetic categories in the front and back mid vowel space.
verified
References
1 Álvarez R, Xove X (2002): Gramática da língua galega. Vigo, Editorial Galaxia.Suche in Google Scholar
2 Amengual M (2011): Spanish and Catalan in Majorca: are there contact-induced changes in the Majorcan Catalan vowel system? In Ortiz L (ed): Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp 214-223.Suche in Google Scholar
3 Amengual M (2012): Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: cognate status effects in a continuum of bilingualism. Biling Lang Cogn 15:517-530.10.1017/S1366728911000460Suche in Google Scholar
4 Amengual M (2013): An Experimental Approach to Phonetic Transfer in the Production and Perception of Early Spanish-Catalan Bilinguals; PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Suche in Google Scholar
5 Amengual M (2014): The perception and production of language-specific mid-vowel contrasts: shifting the focus to the bilingual individual in early language input conditions. Int J Biling DOI: 10.1177/1367006914544988.10.1177/1367006914544988Suche in Google Scholar
6 Amengual M (2015): The acoustic realization of the /a/-/ə/ alternation in Majorcan Catalan. Proc 18th ICPhS, Glasgow.Suche in Google Scholar
7 Amengual M (in press): The perception of language-specific phonetic categories does not guarantee accurate phonological representations in the lexicon of early bilinguals. Appl Psycholing.Suche in Google Scholar
8 Anderson N (1974): On the calculation of filter coefficients for maximum entropy spectral analysis. Geophysics 39:69-72.10.1190/1.1440413Suche in Google Scholar
9 Antoniou M, Best CT, Tyler MD (2013): Focusing the lens of language experience: Perception of Ma'di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals. J Acoust Soc Am 133:2397-2411.10.1121/1.4792358Suche in Google Scholar
10 Antoniou M, Best CT, Tyler MD, Kroos C (2010): Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals' productions in both L1 and L2. J Phonet 38:640-653.10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.005Suche in Google Scholar
11 Antoniou M, Best CT, Tyler MD, Kroos C (2011): Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. J Phonet 39:558-570.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001Suche in Google Scholar
12 Antoniou M, Tyler MD, Best CT (2012): Two ways to listen: do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode? J Phonet 40:582-594.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005Suche in Google Scholar
13 Baird BO (2014): An Acoustic Analysis of Contrastive Focus Marking in Spanish-K'ichee' (Mayan) Bilingual Intonation; PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Suche in Google Scholar
14 Baker W, Trofimovich P (2005): Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Lang Speech 48:1-27.10.1177/00238309050480010101Suche in Google Scholar
15 Basnight-Brown DM, Altarriba J (2007): Code-switching and code-mixing in bilinguals: cognitive, developmental, and empirical approaches; in Ardila A, Ramos E (eds): Speech and Language Disorders in Bilinguals. New York, Nova Science Publishers, pp 69-89.Suche in Google Scholar
16 Best CT (1995): A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception; in Strange W (ed): Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, York Press, pp 171-204.Suche in Google Scholar
17 Birdsong D (2006): Dominance, proficiency, and second language grammatical processing. Appl Psycholing 27:46-49.Suche in Google Scholar
18 Birdsong D (2014): Dominance and age in bilingualism. Appl Ling 35:374-392.10.1093/applin/amu031Suche in Google Scholar
19 Birdsong D, Gertken LM, Amengual M (2012): Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. Austin, COERLL, University of Texas.Suche in Google Scholar
20 Boersma P, Weenink D (2014): Praat: doing phonetics by computer (5.3.18). http://www.praat.org.Suche in Google Scholar
21 Bosch L, Costa A, Sebastián-Gallés N (2000): First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. Eur J Cogn Psychol 12:189-221.10.1080/09541446.2000.10590222Suche in Google Scholar
22 Bradlow AR, Pisoni D, Akahane-Yamada R, Tohkura Y (1997): Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. IV. Some effects of perceptual training on speech production. J Acoust Soc Am 104:2299-2310.10.1121/1.418276Suche in Google Scholar
23 Brière EJ (1968): A Psychological Study of Phonological Interference. The Hague, Mouton.10.1515/9783112414941Suche in Google Scholar
24 Broselow E (1987): An investigation of transfer in second language phonology; in Ioup G, Weinberger S (eds): Interlanguage Phonology. Cambridge, Newbury House, pp 261-278.Suche in Google Scholar
25 Bullock BE, Toribio AJ, González V, Dalola A (2006): Language dominance and performance outcomes in bilingual pronunciation; in O'Brien MG, Shea C, Archibald J (eds): Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference. Somerville, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp 9-16.Suche in Google Scholar
26 Casillas JV (2012): Percepción y procesamiento de contrastes vocálicos en bilingües español/inglés; MA thesis, University of Arizona.Suche in Google Scholar
27 Cebrián J (2000): Transferability and productivity of L1 rules in Catalan-English interlanguage. Stud Sec Lang Acq 22:1-26.10.1017/S0272263100001017Suche in Google Scholar
28 Cedrus Corporation (2012): SuperLab (version 4.5) (computer software). San Pedro.Suche in Google Scholar
29 Clopper CG (2009): Computational methods for normalizing acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Lang Ling Comp 3:1430-1442.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00165.xSuche in Google Scholar
30 Costas González XH (1988): As alteracións do [ɛ] no suroeste galego. Verba 15:385-391.Suche in Google Scholar
31 Cutler A (2002): Native listeners. Eur Rev 10:27-41.10.1017/S1062798702000030Suche in Google Scholar
32 Cutler A, Mehler J, Norris D, Seguí J (1989): Limits on bilingualism. Nature 340:229-230.10.1038/340229a0Suche in Google Scholar
33 DeKeyser R (2000): The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Stud Sec Lang Acq 22:499-534.10.1017/S0272263100004022Suche in Google Scholar
34 Dewaele JM (2004): Perceived language dominance and language preference for emotional speech: the implications for attrition research; in Schmid MS, Köpke B, Kejser M, Weilemar L (eds): First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues. Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp 81-104.Suche in Google Scholar
35 Diehl RL (1987): On segments and segment boundaries. J Phonet 15:289-290.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30573-XSuche in Google Scholar
36 Disner SF (1980): Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. J Acoust Soc Am 67:253-261.10.1121/1.383734Suche in Google Scholar
37 Edwards ML (1974): Perception and production in child phonology: the testing of four hypotheses. J Child Lang 1:205-219.10.1017/S0305000900000659Suche in Google Scholar
38 Ehrensberger-Dow ML, Jekat S (2005): Languages in contact: the influence of language activation and competing language patterns on translation performance. Ling Online February 23, pp 77-92.Suche in Google Scholar
39 Eimas PD (1963): The relation between identification and discrimination along speech and nonspeech continua. Lang Speech 6:206-217.10.1177/002383096300600403Suche in Google Scholar
40 Escudero P, Boersma P, Ruber A, Bion R (2009): A cross-dialectal acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. J Acoust Soc Am 126:1379-1393.10.1121/1.3180321Suche in Google Scholar
41 Flege JE (1987): The production of ‘new' and ‘similar' phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. J Phonet 15:47-65.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6Suche in Google Scholar
42 Flege JE (1991): Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. J Acoust Soc Am 89:395-441.10.1121/1.400473Suche in Google Scholar
43 Flege JE (1992): Speech learning in a second language; in Ferguson C, Menn L, Stoel-Gammon C (eds): Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, York Press, pp 565-604.Suche in Google Scholar
44 Flege JE (1993): Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1589-1608.10.1121/1.406818Suche in Google Scholar
45 Flege JE (1995): Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems; in Strange W (ed): Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, York Press, pp 229-273.Suche in Google Scholar
46 Flege JE (1997a): The role of phonetic category formation in second-language speech learning; in Leather J, James A (eds): New Sounds 97, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. Klagenfurt, University of Klagenfurt, pp 79-89.Suche in Google Scholar
47 Flege JE (1997b): English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: more evidence for the ‘new' vs ‘similar' distinction; in James A, Leather J (eds): Second Language Speech, Structure and Process. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 11-52.10.1515/9783110882933.11Suche in Google Scholar
48 Flege JE (2007): Language contact in bilingualism: phonetic system interactions; in Cole J, Hualde JI (eds): Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 353-382.Suche in Google Scholar
49 Flege JE, Bohn OS, Jang S (1997): Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. J Phonet 25:437-470.10.1006/jpho.1997.0052Suche in Google Scholar
50 Flege JE, MacKay IRA (2004): Perceiving vowels in a second language. Stud Sec Lang Acq 26:1-34.10.1017/S0272263104261010Suche in Google Scholar
51 Flege JE, MacKay IRA, Meador D (1999a): Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2973-2987.10.1121/1.428116Suche in Google Scholar
52 Flege JE, MacKay IRA, Piske T (2002): Assessing bilingual dominance. Appl Psycholing 23:567-598.10.1017/S0142716402004046Suche in Google Scholar
53 Flege JE, Yeni-Komshian GH, Liu S (1999b): Age constraints on second language acquisition. J Mem Lang 41:78-104.10.1006/jmla.1999.2638Suche in Google Scholar
54 Fowler CA (1986): An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. J Phonet 14:3-28.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2Suche in Google Scholar
55 Fowler CA (1994): Invariants, specifiers, cues: an investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation. Percept Psychophys 55:597-610.10.3758/BF03211675Suche in Google Scholar
56 Fowler CA (1996): Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1730-1741.10.1121/1.415237Suche in Google Scholar
57 Fowler CA, Galantucci B (2005): The relation of speech perception and speech production; in Pisoni DB, Remez RE (eds): The handbook of speech perception. New York, Blackwell, pp 633-652.Suche in Google Scholar
58 Freixeiro Mato XR (1997): Lingua galega: normalidade e conflicto. A Coruña, Laiovento. Gertken LM, Amengual M, Birdsong D (2014): Assessing language dominance with the bilingual language profile; in Leclercq P, Edmonds A, Hilton H (eds): Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol, Multilingual Matters, pp 208-225.10.21832/9781783092291-014Suche in Google Scholar
59 González González M, Rodríguez Neira M, Fernández Salgado A, Loredo Gutiérrez X, Suárez Fernández I (2007): Mapa sociolingüístico de Galicia 2004. A Coruña, Real Academia Galega, Seminario de sociolingüística, vol 1: Lingua inicial e competencia en Galicia.Suche in Google Scholar
60 Goto H (1971): Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds ‘L' and ‘R'. Neuropsychologia 9:317-323.10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3Suche in Google Scholar
61 Grosjean F, Miller JL (1994): Going in and out of languages: an example of bilingual flexibility. Psychol Sci 5:201-209.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00501.xSuche in Google Scholar
62 Guion S, Harada T, Clark JJ (2004): Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals' acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bil Lang Cogn 7:207-226.10.1017/S1366728904001592Suche in Google Scholar
63 Hall-Lew L (2010): Improved representation of variance in measures of vowel merger. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Baltimore, vol 127, pp 060002-060012.10.1121/1.3460625Suche in Google Scholar
64 Hay J, Warren P, Drager K (2006): Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. J Phonet 34:458-484.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001Suche in Google Scholar
65 Heredia R (1997): Bilingual memory and hierarchical models: a case for language dominance. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 6:34-39.10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512617Suche in Google Scholar
66 Hillenbrand J, Getty L, Clark M, Wheeler K (1995): Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3099-3111.10.1121/1.411872Suche in Google Scholar
67 Hindle D (1978): Approaches to vowel normalization in the study of natural speech; in Sankoff D (ed): Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. New York, Academic Press, pp 161-171.Suche in Google Scholar
68 Hualde JI (2005): The sounds of Spanish. New York, Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
69 Ingram D (1976): Phonological disability in children. London, Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
70 Jarvis S, Pavlenko A (2008): Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, Routledge.10.4324/9780203935927Suche in Google Scholar
71 Lengeris A, Hazan V (2010): The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels to native speakers of Greek. J Acoust Soc Am 128:3757-3768.10.1121/1.3506351Suche in Google Scholar
72 Liberman AM, Harris KS, Hoffman HS, Griffith BC (1957): The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol 54:358-368.10.1037/h0044417Suche in Google Scholar
73 Liberman AM, Mattingly IG (1985): The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21:1-36.10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6Suche in Google Scholar
74 Lleó C, Cortés S, Benet A (2008): Contact-induced phonological changes in the Catalan spoken in Barcelona; in Siemund P, Kintana N (eds): Language Contact and Contact Languages. Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp 185-212.Suche in Google Scholar
75 Lleó C, Rakow M (2005): Markedness effects in voiced stop spirantization in bilingual German-Spanish children; in Cohen J, McAlister KT, Rolstad K, MacSwan J (eds): Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Somerville, Cascadilla Press, pp 1353-1371.Suche in Google Scholar
76 Lorenzo Suárez AM (2009): A situación actual da lingua galega: unha ollada desde a sociolingüística e a política lingüística. Galicia 21A:20-39.Suche in Google Scholar
77 Loureiro-Rodríguez V, Boggess MM, Goldsmith A (2012): Language attitudes in Galicia: using the match-guise test among high school students. J Multiling Multicult Dev 34:1-18.Suche in Google Scholar
78 Mack M (1989): Consonant and vowel perception and production: Early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Percept Psychophys 46:187-200.10.3758/BF03204982Suche in Google Scholar
79 Macmillan NA (1987): Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: a psychophysical approach to processing modes; in Harnad S (ed): Categorical Perception. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp 53-85.Suche in Google Scholar
80 Maddieson I (1984): Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753459Suche in Google Scholar
81 Mariño Paz R (1998): Historia da lingua galega. Santiago de Compostela, Sotelo Blanco.Suche in Google Scholar
82 Mattingly IG, Liberman AM, Syrdal AK, Halwes T (1971): Discrimination in speech and non-speech modes. Cogn Psychol 2:131-157.10.1016/0010-0285(71)90006-5Suche in Google Scholar
83 Mayo LH, Florentine M, Buus S: (1997): Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:686-693.10.1044/jslhr.4003.686Suche in Google Scholar
84 Meador D, Flege JE, MacKay I (2000): Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Biling Lang Cogn 3:55-67.10.1017/S1366728900000134Suche in Google Scholar
85 Menyuk P (1977): Language and Maturation. Cambridge, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
86 Miyawaki K, Strange W, Verbrugge R, Liberman AM, Jenkins J, Fujimura·(1975): An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Percept Psychophys 18:331-340.10.3758/BF03211209Suche in Google Scholar
87 Molinos Castro R (2002): As vocais átonas finais en galego: estudio acústico. Cadernos de Lingua 24:55-91.10.32766/cdl.24.81Suche in Google Scholar
88 Monteagudo H (1999): Historia social da lingua galega. Idioma, sociedade e cultura a través do tempo. Vigo, Galaxia. Monteagudo H, Santamarina A (1993): Galician and Castilian in contact: historical, social, and linguistic aspects; in Posner R, Green JN (eds): Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology: Bilingualism and Linguistic Conflict in Romance. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 117-174.Suche in Google Scholar
89 Mora JC, Keidel JL, Flege JE (2011): Why are the Catalan contrasts between /e/-/ɛ/ and /o/-/ɔ/ so difficult for even early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals to perceive? In Wrembel M, Kul M, Dziubalska-Kołaczyk K (eds): Achievements and Perspectives in the Acquisition of Second Language Speech: New Sounds 2010. Bern, Lang, vol 2, pp 183-193.Suche in Google Scholar
90 Mora JC, Nadeu M (2012): L2 effects on the perception and production of a native vowel contrast in early bilinguals. Int J Biling 16:484-499.10.1177/1367006911429518Suche in Google Scholar
91 Moreno EM, Kutas M (2005): Processing semantic anomalies in two languages: an electrophysiological exploration in both languages of Spanish-English bilinguals. Cogn Brain Res 22:205-220.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.010Suche in Google Scholar
92 Nañez J, Padilla RV (1995): Bilingualism and processing of elementary cognitive tasks by Chicano adolescents. Biling Res J 19:249-260.10.1080/15235882.1995.10668604Suche in Google Scholar
93 Neary TM (1990): The segment as a unit of speech perception. J Phonet 18:347-373.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30379-1Suche in Google Scholar
94 Neufeld G (1988): Phonological asymmetry in second-language learning and performance. Lang Learn 38:531-560.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00166.xSuche in Google Scholar
95 Ohala JJ (1996): Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1718-1725.10.1121/1.414696Suche in Google Scholar
96 O'Rourke B (2011): Galician and Irish in the European Context: Attitudes towards Weak and Strong Minority Languages. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar
97 Pallier C, Bosch L, Sebastián-Gallés N (1997): A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 64:B9-B17.10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00030-9Suche in Google Scholar
98 Pallier C, Colomé A, Sebastián-Gallés N (2001): The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychol Sci 12:445-449.10.1111/1467-9280.00383Suche in Google Scholar
99 Peterson GE, Barney HL (1952): Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 24:175-184.10.1121/1.1906875Suche in Google Scholar
100 Piske T, Flege JE, McKay IRA, Meador D (2002): The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica 59:49-71.10.1159/000056205Suche in Google Scholar
101 Pisoni D (1995): Some thoughts on ‘normalization' in speech perception. Res Spoken Lang Proc Prog Rep 20:3-30.Suche in Google Scholar
102 Plichta B (2012): Akustyk 1.9: a free Praat plug-in for sociolinguists (computer resource). http://bartus.org/akustyk/.Suche in Google Scholar
103 Ramallo F (2007): Sociolinguistics of Spanish in Galicia. Int J Sociol Lang 184:21-36.10.1515/IJSL.2007.012Suche in Google Scholar
104 Regueira XL (2007): Vocais finais en galego e en portugués: un estudio acústico; in González H, Lama MX (eds): Actas do VII Congreso Internacional de Estudios Galegos. Sada, Ediciós do Castro/Asociación Internacional de Estudos Galegos, pp 859-876.Suche in Google Scholar
105 Regueira XL (2008): Cambios fonolóxicos no galego actual; in Brea M, Fernández Rei F, Regueira XL (eds): Cada palabra pesaba, cada palabra medía. Homenaxe a Antón Santamarina. Santiago de Compostela, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, pp 275-286.Suche in Google Scholar
106 Regueira XL (2010): Dicionario de pronuncia da lingua galega. A Coruña, Instituto da Lingua Galega e Real Academia Galega.Suche in Google Scholar
107 Repp B (1984): Categorical perception: issues, methods, findings. Speech Lang 10:243-335.10.1016/B978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1Suche in Google Scholar
108 Rochet B (1995): Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults; in Strange W (ed): Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, York Press, pp 379-410.Suche in Google Scholar
109 Sebastián-Gallés N, Bosch L (2005): Phonology and bilingualism; in Kroll JF, de Groot, AMB (eds): Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 68-87.Suche in Google Scholar
110 Sebastián-Gallés N, Echeverría S, Bosch L (2005): The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. J Mem Lang 52:240-255.10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.001Suche in Google Scholar
111 Sebastián-Gallés N, Soto-Faraco S (1999): Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition 72:111-123.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00024-4Suche in Google Scholar
112 Sheldon A, Strange W (1982): The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Appl Psycholing 3:243-264.10.1017/S0142716400001417Suche in Google Scholar
113 Simonet M (2011): Production of a Catalan-specific vowel contrast by early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. Phonetica 68:88-110.10.1159/000328847Suche in Google Scholar
114 Simonet M (2014): Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. J Phonet 43:26-37.10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.004Suche in Google Scholar
115 Sloos M (2013): The reversal of the Bären-Beeren merger in Austrian Standard German. Mental Lexicon 8:353-371.10.1075/ml.8.3.05sloSuche in Google Scholar
116 Sunderman G, Kroll JF (2006): First language activation during second language lexical processing: an investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Stud Second Lang Acquis 28:387-422.10.1017/S0272263106060177Suche in Google Scholar
117 Syrdal AK, Gopal HS (1986): A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1086-1100.10.1121/1.393381Suche in Google Scholar
118 Tamamaki K (1993): Language dominance in bilinguals' arithmetic operations according to their language use. Lang Learn 43:239-261.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00716.xSuche in Google Scholar
119 Thomas ER (2002): Instrumental phonetics; in Chambers JK, Trudgill P, Schilling-Estes N (eds): The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford, Blackwell, pp 168-200.Suche in Google Scholar
120 Traunmüller H (1990): Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. J Acoust Soc Am 88:97-100.10.1121/1.399849Suche in Google Scholar
121 Tsukada K, Birdsong D, Bialystok E, Mack M, Sung H, Flege JE (2005): A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native English adults and children. J Phonet 33:263-290.10.1016/j.wocn.2004.10.002Suche in Google Scholar
122 Van Hessen AJ, Schouten MEH (1999): Categorical perception as a function of stimulus quality. Phonetica 56:56-72.10.1159/000028441Suche in Google Scholar
123 Vidal Figueroa T (1997): Estructuras fonéticas de tres dialectos de Vigo. Verba 24:313-332.Suche in Google Scholar
124 Watt DJL, Fabricius AH, Kendall T (2010): More on vowels: plotting and normalizing; in Di Paolo M, Yaeger-Dror M (eds): Sociophonetics: A Student's Guide. London, Routledge, pp 107-118.Suche in Google Scholar
125 Yu ACL (2007): Understanding near-mergers: the case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology 24:187-214.10.1017/S0952675707001157Suche in Google Scholar
126 Zampini ML (1994): The role of native language transfer and task formality in the acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Hispania 77:470-481.10.2307/344974Suche in Google Scholar
127 Zwicker E (1961): Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands. J Acoust Soc Am 33:248.10.1121/1.1908630Suche in Google Scholar
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Further Section
- Contents Vol. 72, 2015
- Front and Back Matter
- Front & Back Matter
- Original Paper
- The Effects of Language Dominance in the Perception and Production of the Galician Mid Vowel Contrasts
- Voice Register in Mon: Acoustics and Electroglottography
- Telephone Transmission and Earwitnesses: Performance on Voice Parades Controlled for Voice Similarity
- Further Section
- Publications Received for Review
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Further Section
- Contents Vol. 72, 2015
- Front and Back Matter
- Front & Back Matter
- Original Paper
- The Effects of Language Dominance in the Perception and Production of the Galician Mid Vowel Contrasts
- Voice Register in Mon: Acoustics and Electroglottography
- Telephone Transmission and Earwitnesses: Performance on Voice Parades Controlled for Voice Similarity
- Further Section
- Publications Received for Review