Explaining Attitudinal Ratings of Dutch Rising Contours: Morphological Structure vs. the Frequency Code

References

1 Bezooijen, van R.: Characteristics and recognizability of vocal expressions of emotion (Foris, Dordrecht-Riverton 1984).10.1515/9783110850390Search in Google Scholar

2 Boersma, P.; Weenink, D.: PRAAT: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Rep. Inst. Phonet. Sci., University of Amsterdam, Vol. 132 (1996).Search in Google Scholar

3 Caspers, J.: Who’s next? The melodic marking of question versus continuation in Dutch. Lang. Speech 41: 375–398 (1998).10.1177/002383099804100407Search in Google Scholar

4 Chen, A.; Rietveld, T.; Gussenhoven, C.: Language-specific effects of pitch range on the perception of universal intonational meaning; in Proc. Eurospeech 2001, Aalborg, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 1403–1407.10.21437/Eurospeech.2001-362Search in Google Scholar

5 Cruttenden, A.: Rises in English; in Windsor Lewis, Studies in general and English phonetics: essays in honour of Professor J.D. O’Connor, pp. 155–173 (Routledge, London 1994).Search in Google Scholar

6 Grabe, E.; Gussenhoven, C.; Haan, J.; Marsi E.; Post B.: Preaccentual pitch and speaker attitude in Dutch. Lang. Speech 41: 63–85 (1997).10.1177/002383099804100104Search in Google Scholar

7 Gussenhoven, C.; Rietveld, T.; Terken, J.: ToDI. http://lands.let.kun.nl/todi (1999).Search in Google Scholar

8 Haan, J.: Speaking of questions. an exploration of Dutch question intonation; PhD thesis University of Nijmegen (2002).Search in Google Scholar

9 ’t Hart, J.: Intonation in Dutch; in Hirst, Di Cristo, Intonation Systems, pp. 96–111 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998).Search in Google Scholar

10 Keijsper, C.E.: Vorm en betekenis in Nederlandse toonhoogtecontouren, parts 1 and 2. Forum der Letteren 25: 20–37, 113–126 (1984).Search in Google Scholar

11 Kraaijeveld, J.: Idiosyncrasy in prosody: speaker and speaker group identification; PhD thesis University of Nijmegen (unpublished, 1997).Search in Google Scholar

12 Ladd, D.R.: Intonational phonology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996).Search in Google Scholar

13 Liberman, M.; Pierrehumbert J.: Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length; in Aronoff, Oehrle, Language and sound structure, pp. 157–233 (MIT, Cambridge 1984).Search in Google Scholar

14 Morton, E.W.: On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Amer. Naturalist 111: 855–869 (1977).10.1086/283219Search in Google Scholar

15 Ohala, J.J.: Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40: 1–18 (1983).10.1159/000261678Search in Google Scholar

16 Ohala, J.J.: An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F₀ of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16 (1984).10.1159/000261706Search in Google Scholar

17 Ohala, J.J.: The frequency code underlines the sound symbolic use of voice of pitch; in Hinton, Nichols, Ohala, Sound symbolism, pp. 325–347 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994).10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022Search in Google Scholar

18 Oppenrieder, W.: Intonatorische Kennzeichnung von Satzmodi; in Altmann, Intonationsforschungen (Niemeyer, Tübingen 1988)10.1515/9783111358413.169Search in Google Scholar

19 Prieto, P.; Shih, C.; Nibert H.: Pitch downtrend in Spanish. J. Phonet. 24: 445–473 (1996).10.1006/jpho.1996.0024Search in Google Scholar

20 Rietveld, T.; van Hout, R.: Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1993).10.1515/9783110871609Search in Google Scholar

21 Swerts, M.; Bouwhuis, D.G.; Collier, R.: Melodic cues to ‘finality’ in discourse units. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 96: 2064–2075 (1994).10.1121/1.410148Search in Google Scholar

22 Van Es, G.A.: Syntaxis en dialectstudie: intonatie en syntaxis, parts 1, 2, 3. Onze Taaltuin 1: 87–94, 122–128, 169–175 (1932).Search in Google Scholar

23 Wells, J.C.: Accents of English (Longman, London 1981).10.1017/CBO9780511611759Search in Google Scholar