An X-Ray Investigation of Pharyngeal Constriction in American English Schwa

References

1 Alwan, A.A.; Narayanan, S.S.; Haker, K.: Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 1078–1089 (1997).10.1121/1.417972Suche in Google Scholar

2 Ash, S.: The vocalization of /l/ in Philadelphia; PhD diss. University of Pennsylvania (1982).Suche in Google Scholar

3 Barry, W.: Comments on chapter 2 (Browman and Goldstein); in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. II: Gesture, segment, prosody, pp. 65–67 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).Suche in Google Scholar

4 Browman, C.P.; Goldstem, L.: ‘Targetless’ schwa: an articulatory analysis; in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. II: Gesture, segment, prosody, pp. 26–56 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).10.1017/CBO9780511519918.003Suche in Google Scholar

5 Browman, C.P.; Goldstein, L.: Gestural syllable position effects in American English; in Bell-Berti, Raphael, Producing speech: contemporary issues. For Katherine Safford Harris, pp. 19–34 (American Institute of Physics, Woodbury 1995).Suche in Google Scholar

6 Cooper, F.S.; Abramson, A.S.: A pilot x-ray film of English articulations with stretched sound (Haskins Laboratories and Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York 1960).Suche in Google Scholar

7 Delattre, P.C.; Freeman, D.C.: A dialect study of American r’s by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics 44: 29–68 (1968).10.1515/ling.1968.6.44.29Suche in Google Scholar

8 Gick, B.: A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English. Phonology 16: 29–54 (1999).10.1017/S0952675799003693Suche in Google Scholar

9 Gick, B.: Articulatory correlates of ambisyllabicity in English glides and liquids; in Local, Ogden, Temple, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. VI: Constraints on phonetic interpretation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press).Suche in Google Scholar

10 Gick, B.; Kang, M.; Whalen, D.H.: MRI and X-ray evidence for commonality in the dorsal articulations of English vowels and liquids. Proc. 5th Semin. on Speech Production: Models and Data and the Crest Workshop on Models of Speech Production: Motor Planning and Articulatory Modeling, Kloster Seeon, Bavaria 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

11 Giegerich, H.: English phonology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).10.1017/CBO9781139166126Suche in Google Scholar

12 Giles, S.B.; Moll, K.L.: Cinefluorographic study of selected allophones of English /l/. Phonetica 31: 206–227 (1975).10.1159/000259670Suche in Google Scholar

13 Hagiwara, R.: Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as produced by women and men. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 90: (1995).Suche in Google Scholar

14 Halle, M.; Mohanan, K.P.: Segmental phonology of modern English. Ling. Inquiry 16: 57–116 (1985).Suche in Google Scholar

15 Hardcastle, W.; Barry, W.: Articulatory and perceptual factors in /l/ vocalisations in English. JIPA 15: 3–17 (1989).10.1017/S0025100300002930Suche in Google Scholar

16 Heffner, R.-M.S.: General phonetics (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison 1950).Suche in Google Scholar

17 Jones, C.: A history of English phonology (Longman, London 1989).Suche in Google Scholar

18 Jones, D.: An English pronouncing dictionary; revised from 1917 (Dent & Sons, London 1928). Keating, P.; Wright, R.; Zhang, J.: Word-level asymmetries in consonant articulation. Revised version of UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 97, pp. 139–151 (unpublished).Suche in Google Scholar

19 Kingston, J.: Comments on chapter 2 (Browman and Goldstein); in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. II: Gesture, segment, prosody, pp. 60–65 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).Suche in Google Scholar

20 McCarthy, J.: A case of surface constraint violation. Can. J. Ling. 38: 169–195 (1993).10.1017/S0008413100014730Suche in Google Scholar

21 McCarthy, J.: A note on Boston r and the elsewhere condition. Appendix to McCarthy, Review of Iggy Roca (ed.) (1997) Derivations and constraints in phonology, Oxford University Press. Phonology (in press). Available only via the Internet at http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/∼jjmccart/appendix.pdf (1999).Suche in Google Scholar

22 McMahon, A.; Foulkes, P.; Tollfree, L.: Gestural representation and lexical phonology. Phonology 11: 277–316 (1994).10.1017/S0952675700001974Suche in Google Scholar

23 Schwab, R.J.; Gefter, W.B.; Pack, A.I.; Hoffman, E.A.: Dynamic imaging of the upper airway during respiration in normal subjects. J. appl. Physiol. 74: 1504–1514 (1993).10.1152/jappl.1993.74.4.1504Suche in Google Scholar

24 Sproat, R.; Fujimura, O.: Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. J. Phonet. 21: 291–311 (1993).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3Suche in Google Scholar

25 Trudo, F.J.; Gefter, W.B.; Welch, K.C.; Gupta, K.B.; Maislin, G.; Schwab, R.J. State-related changes in upper airway caliber and surrounding soft-tissue structures in normal subjects. Am. J. resp. crit. Care Med. 158: 1259–1270 (1998).10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9712063Suche in Google Scholar

26 Turk, A.: Articulatory phonetic clues to syllable affiliation: gestural characteristics of bilabial stops; in Keating, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. III: Phonological structure and phonetic form, pp. 107–135 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994).10.1017/CBO9780511659461.008Suche in Google Scholar

27 Westbury, J.R.; Hashi, M.; Lindstrom, M.J.: Differences among speakers in articulation of American English /r/. Speech Commun. 26: 203–226 (1998).10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00058-2Suche in Google Scholar