Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 11. Licensing distributivity
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 11. Licensing distributivity

The role of plural morphology
  • Hanna de Vries
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Crossroads Semantics
This chapter is in the book Crossroads Semantics

Abstract

This study investigates how the availability of quantificational distributivity depends on the morphosyntactic number of the VP, based on two different case studies: first, the behaviour of sentences with a group NP subject (such as the class or my family) in British English; and second, the interpretation of coordinated VPs in sentences like The guests are surrounding the newlyweds and singing or dancing. I argue that distributivity is only available when the VP is plural, not when it is singular or uninflected. This approach goes back to Link’s (1983) original intuition that pluralisation and distributivity are two sides of the same coin. It also provides support for compositional analyses of semantic pluralisation, according to which predicates originate as singular and are pluralised at a higher derivational level, instead of being “born plural” as in e.g. Krifka (1992), Landman (1996), and Kratzer (2008).

Abstract

This study investigates how the availability of quantificational distributivity depends on the morphosyntactic number of the VP, based on two different case studies: first, the behaviour of sentences with a group NP subject (such as the class or my family) in British English; and second, the interpretation of coordinated VPs in sentences like The guests are surrounding the newlyweds and singing or dancing. I argue that distributivity is only available when the VP is plural, not when it is singular or uninflected. This approach goes back to Link’s (1983) original intuition that pluralisation and distributivity are two sides of the same coin. It also provides support for compositional analyses of semantic pluralisation, according to which predicates originate as singular and are pluralised at a higher derivational level, instead of being “born plural” as in e.g. Krifka (1992), Landman (1996), and Kratzer (2008).

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/z.210.11dev/html
Scroll to top button