Home Linguistics & Semiotics Versatility of nominalizations
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Versatility of nominalizations

Where Japanese and Korean contrast
  • Kaoru Horie
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Nominalization in Asian Languages
This chapter is in the book Nominalization in Asian Languages

Abstract

This paper presents a contrastive analysis of Japanese and Korean nominalized constructions, i.e. (I) Head Internal Relatives (HIRs) and (II) Sentence-final nominalized constructions. Japanese HIRs are shown to manifest a greater degree of cross-constructional extension than their Korean counterparts. Sentence-final nominalized constructions, which take on various pragmatic-semantic functions, also display a parallel cross-linguistic contrast in terms of interpretive versatility. This paper argues that these cross-linguistic contrasts are correlated with the differential degrees of functional extension of non-conclusive verb forms as nominal, and finally with the differential preferences toward noun-oriented structures between Japanese and Korean.

Abstract

This paper presents a contrastive analysis of Japanese and Korean nominalized constructions, i.e. (I) Head Internal Relatives (HIRs) and (II) Sentence-final nominalized constructions. Japanese HIRs are shown to manifest a greater degree of cross-constructional extension than their Korean counterparts. Sentence-final nominalized constructions, which take on various pragmatic-semantic functions, also display a parallel cross-linguistic contrast in terms of interpretive versatility. This paper argues that these cross-linguistic contrasts are correlated with the differential degrees of functional extension of non-conclusive verb forms as nominal, and finally with the differential preferences toward noun-oriented structures between Japanese and Korean.

Downloaded on 6.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.96.17hor/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button