Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Negative concord in Alemannic

An OT-approach at the syntax-morphology interface

Abstract

The article focuses on variation in negative concord (NC) between and within the grammars of speakers of Alemannic. Based on a broad data set, partial grammars from individuals are extracted, and four different systems are attested: Grammar 1 with obligatory negative spread (N-spread), Grammar 2 with optional negative doubling (N-doubling), Grammar 3 with N-spread and N-doubling, and Grammar 4 without NC. My proposal in the framework of Optimality Theory (OT) is based upon two assumptions: the generation of syntactic structures is unmarked in comparison to the generation of morphological structures (cf. Ackema & Neeleman 2001; Vogel 2006); weak indefinites and negative indefinites (n-indefinites) are not different lexemes, but only allomorphs (cf. Weiß 2002a).

Abstract

The article focuses on variation in negative concord (NC) between and within the grammars of speakers of Alemannic. Based on a broad data set, partial grammars from individuals are extracted, and four different systems are attested: Grammar 1 with obligatory negative spread (N-spread), Grammar 2 with optional negative doubling (N-doubling), Grammar 3 with N-spread and N-doubling, and Grammar 4 without NC. My proposal in the framework of Optimality Theory (OT) is based upon two assumptions: the generation of syntactic structures is unmarked in comparison to the generation of morphological structures (cf. Ackema & Neeleman 2001; Vogel 2006); weak indefinites and negative indefinites (n-indefinites) are not different lexemes, but only allomorphs (cf. Weiß 2002a).

Downloaded on 14.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.207.09mos/html
Scroll to top button