Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 7. The role of duoethnography in critical ELT research
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 7. The role of duoethnography in critical ELT research

Reflexivity, ideology critique, and praxis
  • Robert J. Lowe
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

Duoethnography is an approach to research often associated with projects; that is, with research which is focused on issues of discrimination, prejudice, and social justice. In recent years, such research has often been aligned theoretically with , which resists theory building, and instead aims to question and deconstruct dominant power relations. However, there has been a recent move in critical ELT research towards forms of critique associated with , critical realism, and critical theory. Building on this structural (re)turn, this chapter explores the role duoethnography could play in a research program oriented around the post-Marxist critical theory of the early Frankfurt School. Drawing on a conception of critical theory as a form of self-reflexive social science focused on ideology critique and emancipatory praxis, this chapter explores how the dialogic nature of duoethnography could be reconstituted as an engine for theoretical development and raising. It is suggested that through processes of immanent critique, duoethnography could be used to evaluate the internal coherence of claims within a critical program of research in ELT, as well as identifying starting points for ideology critique. Finally, the accessibility of duoethnographic work is presented as a possible route for transforming research into praxis.

Abstract

Duoethnography is an approach to research often associated with projects; that is, with research which is focused on issues of discrimination, prejudice, and social justice. In recent years, such research has often been aligned theoretically with , which resists theory building, and instead aims to question and deconstruct dominant power relations. However, there has been a recent move in critical ELT research towards forms of critique associated with , critical realism, and critical theory. Building on this structural (re)turn, this chapter explores the role duoethnography could play in a research program oriented around the post-Marxist critical theory of the early Frankfurt School. Drawing on a conception of critical theory as a form of self-reflexive social science focused on ideology critique and emancipatory praxis, this chapter explores how the dialogic nature of duoethnography could be reconstituted as an engine for theoretical development and raising. It is suggested that through processes of immanent critique, duoethnography could be used to evaluate the internal coherence of claims within a critical program of research in ELT, as well as identifying starting points for ideology critique. Finally, the accessibility of duoethnographic work is presented as a possible route for transforming research into praxis.

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/rmal.8.07low/html
Scroll to top button