Home Chapter 1. Challenges in the contrastive study of discourse markers
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 1. Challenges in the contrastive study of discourse markers

The case of then
  • Karin Aijmer
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

I argue that the position of the discourse markers in the utterance should be part of the contrastive analysis on the basis of a corpus case study of then and its Swedish cognate då. The focus for the contrastive analysis has been on then which has been studied both in the left and the right periphery while has been investigated only in its use in the right periphery. English and Swedish then/då seem to have partly overlapping polysemies reflecting the fact that they are not completely grammaticalized. However, when we take the position of then/då into account there are differences between them reflecting both the uncertain distinction between their uses as discourse marker or modal particle and that languages prefer different strategies.

Abstract

I argue that the position of the discourse markers in the utterance should be part of the contrastive analysis on the basis of a corpus case study of then and its Swedish cognate då. The focus for the contrastive analysis has been on then which has been studied both in the left and the right periphery while has been investigated only in its use in the right periphery. English and Swedish then/då seem to have partly overlapping polysemies reflecting the fact that they are not completely grammaticalized. However, when we take the position of then/då into account there are differences between them reflecting both the uncertain distinction between their uses as discourse marker or modal particle and that languages prefer different strategies.

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.305.01aij/html
Scroll to top button