Home General Interest Chapter 7. Direct speech, subjectivity and speaker positioning in London English and Paris French
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 7. Direct speech, subjectivity and speaker positioning in London English and Paris French

  • Maria Secova
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Positioning the Self and Others
This chapter is in the book Positioning the Self and Others

Abstract

This paper examines functional similarities and differences in the use of pragmatic features – in particular quotatives and general extenders – on the right and left periphery of direct quotations. This comparative study, based on the analysis of a contemporary corpus of London English and Paris French (MLE – MPF),1 finds that the form and frequency of these particles tend to vary not only with respect to social factors such as speakers’ age and gender, but also with respect to the different pragmatic functions they come to perform in different interactional settings. The contemporary data is analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to show how different variants position the speaker in relation to: (i) the content of the quote, (ii) the interlocutors, (iii) the presumed author of the quote. The paper aims to contribute to a better understanding of pragmatic universals and variability in the use of direct speech.

Abstract

This paper examines functional similarities and differences in the use of pragmatic features – in particular quotatives and general extenders – on the right and left periphery of direct quotations. This comparative study, based on the analysis of a contemporary corpus of London English and Paris French (MLE – MPF),1 finds that the form and frequency of these particles tend to vary not only with respect to social factors such as speakers’ age and gender, but also with respect to the different pragmatic functions they come to perform in different interactional settings. The contemporary data is analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to show how different variants position the speaker in relation to: (i) the content of the quote, (ii) the interlocutors, (iii) the presumed author of the quote. The paper aims to contribute to a better understanding of pragmatic universals and variability in the use of direct speech.

Downloaded on 3.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.292.07sec/html
Scroll to top button