Home General Interest Eastern boys and girls! Comparative linguistic anthropologies of lesbian and gay communities, Kuala Lumpur and Sorwool
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Eastern boys and girls! Comparative linguistic anthropologies of lesbian and gay communities, Kuala Lumpur and Sorwool

  • Michael Dimitrios Hadzantonis
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Gender, Language and the Periphery
This chapter is in the book Gender, Language and the Periphery

Abstract

Motivated by social inclusion, lesbian and gay communities have long attempted to negotiate languages and connected discourses. Social ascriptions act to oppress these communities, thus grounding Cameron’s (1985) Feminism and Linguistic theory. This practice of language negotiation significantly intensifies in regions where religious piety (Hinduism, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam) interacts with rigid social structure (Confucianism, Interdependency), mediating social and cultural positioning. Consequently, members of LG communities build linguistic affordances, thus (re)positioning selves so to negotiate ascribed identities and marginalizations. Paradoxically, these communities model, or draw from, discourses and dynamics of those larger sociocultural networks with which intercommunal boundaries exist, so to contest or alleviate marginalizations, thus repositioning self and other in sociocultural interstices. Through a comparative framework, the current study employs ethnography, as well as conversation and discourse analyses, of LG communities, to explore ways in which these communities in Kuala Lumpur and Sorwool (Seoul) develop and employ adroit language practices to struggle within social spaces, and to contest positivist ascriptions.

Abstract

Motivated by social inclusion, lesbian and gay communities have long attempted to negotiate languages and connected discourses. Social ascriptions act to oppress these communities, thus grounding Cameron’s (1985) Feminism and Linguistic theory. This practice of language negotiation significantly intensifies in regions where religious piety (Hinduism, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam) interacts with rigid social structure (Confucianism, Interdependency), mediating social and cultural positioning. Consequently, members of LG communities build linguistic affordances, thus (re)positioning selves so to negotiate ascribed identities and marginalizations. Paradoxically, these communities model, or draw from, discourses and dynamics of those larger sociocultural networks with which intercommunal boundaries exist, so to contest or alleviate marginalizations, thus repositioning self and other in sociocultural interstices. Through a comparative framework, the current study employs ethnography, as well as conversation and discourse analyses, of LG communities, to explore ways in which these communities in Kuala Lumpur and Sorwool (Seoul) develop and employ adroit language practices to struggle within social spaces, and to contest positivist ascriptions.

Downloaded on 24.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.264.12had/html
Scroll to top button