Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 6. The acquisition of the non-subject status of nominative objects in Japanese
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 6. The acquisition of the non-subject status of nominative objects in Japanese

  • Tetsuya Sano , Hiroyuki Shimada and Yoshiki Fujiwara
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This paper examines the L1 acquisition of the Japanese nominative object construction and discusses its implication for the Universal Phase Requirement (UPR) Hypothesis in Wexler (2004) and Hirsch and Wexler (2007). Although the results of our first experiment could be interpreted as evidence against the UPR Hypothesis, we raise the question of whether this interpretation is legitimate, and discuss what should be considered in a suitable evaluation of the UPR Hypothesis with the nominative object construction. Given the finding in our second experiment, our third experiment provides some preliminary data that suggest that the L1 acquisition of the Japanese nominative object construction may support the UPR Hypothesis.

Abstract

This paper examines the L1 acquisition of the Japanese nominative object construction and discusses its implication for the Universal Phase Requirement (UPR) Hypothesis in Wexler (2004) and Hirsch and Wexler (2007). Although the results of our first experiment could be interpreted as evidence against the UPR Hypothesis, we raise the question of whether this interpretation is legitimate, and discuss what should be considered in a suitable evaluation of the UPR Hypothesis with the nominative object construction. Given the finding in our second experiment, our third experiment provides some preliminary data that suggest that the L1 acquisition of the Japanese nominative object construction may support the UPR Hypothesis.

Downloaded on 9.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/lald.60.07san/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button