Home Linguistics & Semiotics Processing morphology in L2 Turkish
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Processing morphology in L2 Turkish

The effects of morphological richness in the L1
  • Serkan Uygun and Ayşe Gürel
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
This chapter is in the book Second Language Acquisition of Turkish

Abstract

Cross-linguistic research suggests that the processing of multimorphemic words in a language is tuned by its morphological characteristics. This means the processing pattern of a language either as a first (L1) or a second language (L2) can be influenced by its morphological properties. In L2 acquisition, the question is whether learners demonstrate, like native speakers, a processing pattern that is shaped by the morphological structure of that language or whether they follow an L1-based processing route. The present study explores this via unprimed lexical decision data from L1-English and L1-Russian learners of L2 Turkish. The results revealed decomposition in Russian-speaking participants but not in Turkish speakers or English-speaking participants. This implies L2 proficiency-­based differences in the extent of L1 transfer in processing inflection.

Abstract

Cross-linguistic research suggests that the processing of multimorphemic words in a language is tuned by its morphological characteristics. This means the processing pattern of a language either as a first (L1) or a second language (L2) can be influenced by its morphological properties. In L2 acquisition, the question is whether learners demonstrate, like native speakers, a processing pattern that is shaped by the morphological structure of that language or whether they follow an L1-based processing route. The present study explores this via unprimed lexical decision data from L1-English and L1-Russian learners of L2 Turkish. The results revealed decomposition in Russian-speaking participants but not in Turkish speakers or English-speaking participants. This implies L2 proficiency-­based differences in the extent of L1 transfer in processing inflection.

Downloaded on 9.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/lald.59.10uyg/html
Scroll to top button