Chapter 7. “Worth a moment’s notice”
-
Victorina González-Díaz
Abstract
This paper explores the competition between round brackets and other punctuation marks as delimiters of kinesic parentheticals in Austen’s dialogue (e.g. said Harriet, in a mortified voice). Drawing mainly on an analysis of Emma, the investigation suggests that, linguistically, round brackets in Austen are preferred over other punctuation marks in cases where the kinesic parenthetical is not introduced by a reporting clause and takes the form of an -ing clause (e.g. laughing affectedly). Stylistically, the data show that kinesic parentheticals are amenable to an interpretation along Mahlberg’s (2007) distinction between ‘contextualising’ and ‘highlighting’ textual functions; the ‘highlighting’ functions being more prominent when the kinesic information is introduced by round brackets. More generally, the paper provides an example of how punctuation can contribute to textual structuring. Jane Austen is known to have disliked parenthetical attributions of speech (Toner 2012). In this connection, the paper tentatively suggests that the use of rounds brackets as kinesic parenthetical markers in her work may partly be the result of Austen’s stylistic experimentation with ways of avoiding attribution of speech markers and helping the reader to identify secondary (female) characters.
Abstract
This paper explores the competition between round brackets and other punctuation marks as delimiters of kinesic parentheticals in Austen’s dialogue (e.g. said Harriet, in a mortified voice). Drawing mainly on an analysis of Emma, the investigation suggests that, linguistically, round brackets in Austen are preferred over other punctuation marks in cases where the kinesic parenthetical is not introduced by a reporting clause and takes the form of an -ing clause (e.g. laughing affectedly). Stylistically, the data show that kinesic parentheticals are amenable to an interpretation along Mahlberg’s (2007) distinction between ‘contextualising’ and ‘highlighting’ textual functions; the ‘highlighting’ functions being more prominent when the kinesic information is introduced by round brackets. More generally, the paper provides an example of how punctuation can contribute to textual structuring. Jane Austen is known to have disliked parenthetical attributions of speech (Toner 2012). In this connection, the paper tentatively suggests that the use of rounds brackets as kinesic parenthetical markers in her work may partly be the result of Austen’s stylistic experimentation with ways of avoiding attribution of speech markers and helping the reader to identify secondary (female) characters.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Introduction 1
- Chapter 1. Enregistering the North 13
- Chapter 2. The origin and development of the iffy-an(d) conjunction 31
- Chapter 3. From ornament to armament 49
- Chapter 4. Borrowing and copy 71
- Chapter 5. Decoding the parentheses in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus 87
- Chapter 6. The first person in fiction of the 1790s 111
- Chapter 7. “Worth a moment’s notice” 129
- Chapter 8. Jane Austen and the prescriptivists 151
- Chapter 9. Dismantling narrative modes 171
- Chapter 10. Stylistics and “He Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven” by W.B. Yeats 195
- Index 213
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Introduction 1
- Chapter 1. Enregistering the North 13
- Chapter 2. The origin and development of the iffy-an(d) conjunction 31
- Chapter 3. From ornament to armament 49
- Chapter 4. Borrowing and copy 71
- Chapter 5. Decoding the parentheses in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus 87
- Chapter 6. The first person in fiction of the 1790s 111
- Chapter 7. “Worth a moment’s notice” 129
- Chapter 8. Jane Austen and the prescriptivists 151
- Chapter 9. Dismantling narrative modes 171
- Chapter 10. Stylistics and “He Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven” by W.B. Yeats 195
- Index 213
