Home Linguistics & Semiotics Inalienable possession
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Inalienable possession

the status of the definite article
  • Bert Le Bruyn
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Weak Referentiality
This chapter is in the book Weak Referentiality

Abstract

We argue that the use of the definite article in French inalienable possession constructions does not lead us to abandon a unified analysis of definite articles. We face two challenges. First, the definite article in French inalienable possession constructions does not seem to convey uniqueness: Jean lve la main John raises the hand is felicitous independently of whether Jean has one or two hands. Second, if the definite article in these constructions is a run-of-the-mill definite article we seem to be left without an explanation for the variation between French and English that led both Guron (1983, 1985) and Vergnaud and Zubizarreta (1992) to assume that the definite article in French is structurally different from the one in English.

Abstract

We argue that the use of the definite article in French inalienable possession constructions does not lead us to abandon a unified analysis of definite articles. We face two challenges. First, the definite article in French inalienable possession constructions does not seem to convey uniqueness: Jean lve la main John raises the hand is felicitous independently of whether Jean has one or two hands. Second, if the definite article in these constructions is a run-of-the-mill definite article we seem to be left without an explanation for the variation between French and English that led both Guron (1983, 1985) and Vergnaud and Zubizarreta (1992) to assume that the definite article in French is structurally different from the one in English.

Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.219.13bru/html
Scroll to top button