Home Linguistics & Semiotics Unscrambling the lexical nature of weak definites
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Unscrambling the lexical nature of weak definites

  • Peter de Swart and Geertje van Bergen
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Weak Referentiality
This chapter is in the book Weak Referentiality

Abstract

We investigate how the lexical nature of weak definites influences the phenomenon of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Earlier experiments have indicated that weak definites are more resistant to scrambling than strong definites. We examine how the notion of weak definiteness used in this experimental work can be reduced to lexical connectedness. We explore four different ways of quantifying the relation between a direct object and the verb. Our results show that predictability of a verb given the object (verb cloze probability) provides the best fit to the weak/strong distinction used in the earlier experiments

Abstract

We investigate how the lexical nature of weak definites influences the phenomenon of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Earlier experiments have indicated that weak definites are more resistant to scrambling than strong definites. We examine how the notion of weak definiteness used in this experimental work can be reduced to lexical connectedness. We explore four different ways of quantifying the relation between a direct object and the verb. Our results show that predictability of a verb given the object (verb cloze probability) provides the best fit to the weak/strong distinction used in the earlier experiments

Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.219.12swa/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button