Home Linguistics & Semiotics Zero time-arguments in French child language
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Zero time-arguments in French child language

  • Hamida Demirdache and Oana Lungu
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

We argue that zero-tenses in L1 French surface as either past (parameter value in SOT languages) or present (parameter value in non-SOT languages). Co-existing parameter settings in child language are expected on a Multiple Grammar approach where acquisition involves grammar competition. Our proposal explains why French children allow non-indexical/zero-tense construals of present, although present (under past) is utterance-indexical in SOT languages. It extends to children acquiring a non-SOT language: Japanese children allow (non-adult) zero-tense construals of past. We further argue for a scopal account of independent construals of relative clauses. Together with the observation of Isomorphism in the syntax/LF mapping in child language, the scopal account explains why children enforce non-indexical/zero-tense construals of present/past in relative (but not complement) clauses.

Abstract

We argue that zero-tenses in L1 French surface as either past (parameter value in SOT languages) or present (parameter value in non-SOT languages). Co-existing parameter settings in child language are expected on a Multiple Grammar approach where acquisition involves grammar competition. Our proposal explains why French children allow non-indexical/zero-tense construals of present, although present (under past) is utterance-indexical in SOT languages. It extends to children acquiring a non-SOT language: Japanese children allow (non-adult) zero-tense construals of past. We further argue for a scopal account of independent construals of relative clauses. Together with the observation of Isomorphism in the syntax/LF mapping in child language, the scopal account explains why children enforce non-indexical/zero-tense construals of present/past in relative (but not complement) clauses.

Downloaded on 15.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.158.18dem/html
Scroll to top button