Home Linguistics & Semiotics Object control in Korean
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Object control in Korean

A backward control impostor
  • Nayoung Kwon , Philip J. Monahan and Maria Polinsky
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Movement Theory of Control
This chapter is in the book Movement Theory of Control

Abstract

This chapter presents and analyzes three constructions associated with object control in Korean. The constructions differ in the case marking and position of the controllee. We show that in one of these constructions, the controllee, marked in the nominative, appears in the embedded clause. At first glance this construction (which we refer to as NOM) resembles other attested cases of backward object control; however, based on primary evidence and processing data, we argue that it is an “impostor”. It instantiates non-obligatory control, with the nominative in the embedded clause co-indexed with the null pronominal object in the matrix. Since the embedded clause is adjoined to the main clause, binding violations do not occur.

Abstract

This chapter presents and analyzes three constructions associated with object control in Korean. The constructions differ in the case marking and position of the controllee. We show that in one of these constructions, the controllee, marked in the nominative, appears in the embedded clause. At first glance this construction (which we refer to as NOM) resembles other attested cases of backward object control; however, based on primary evidence and processing data, we argue that it is an “impostor”. It instantiates non-obligatory control, with the nominative in the embedded clause co-indexed with the null pronominal object in the matrix. Since the embedded clause is adjoined to the main clause, binding violations do not occur.

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.154.11kwo/html
Scroll to top button