Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 5. Classification of nominal compounds containing mimetics
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 5. Classification of nominal compounds containing mimetics

A Construction Morphology perspective
  • Kiyoko Toratani
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
This chapter is in the book Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives

Abstract

In Japanese, some nominal compounds have mimetic components (Nominal Compounds with Mimetics (NCMs)) (e.g., zaazaa-buri [mimetic(the sound of heavy rain)-a fall(from the sky)] ‘a downpour’). This paper examines how mimetics participate in word-formation of nominal compounds, applying Construction Morphology. Examination of representative NCMs indicates: (i) NCMs are mostly right-headed, although some are double-headed, and (ii) mimetics combine with the types of nouns that combine with non-mimetic components. Given this, the paper proposes NCMs are part of the inheritance hierarchy for nominal compounds; specifically, their top node diverges according to the head position, building on Booij (2010: 7). The hierarchy consists of different constructional schemas, such as <[xi-hada]nk ↔ [hada ‘skin’ with attribute SEMi]k>, wherein the variable x can be replaced by a mimetic, as in gasagasa-hada ‘rough skin’, or a non-mimetic, as in yawa-hada ‘soft skin’. The paper argues that mimetics are an integral part of nominal compound word formation, enriching lexical varieties of nominal compounds. The Construction Morphology representational system proves useful to indicate where NCMs appear in the word network.

Abstract

In Japanese, some nominal compounds have mimetic components (Nominal Compounds with Mimetics (NCMs)) (e.g., zaazaa-buri [mimetic(the sound of heavy rain)-a fall(from the sky)] ‘a downpour’). This paper examines how mimetics participate in word-formation of nominal compounds, applying Construction Morphology. Examination of representative NCMs indicates: (i) NCMs are mostly right-headed, although some are double-headed, and (ii) mimetics combine with the types of nouns that combine with non-mimetic components. Given this, the paper proposes NCMs are part of the inheritance hierarchy for nominal compounds; specifically, their top node diverges according to the head position, building on Booij (2010: 7). The hierarchy consists of different constructional schemas, such as <[xi-hada]nk ↔ [hada ‘skin’ with attribute SEMi]k>, wherein the variable x can be replaced by a mimetic, as in gasagasa-hada ‘rough skin’, or a non-mimetic, as in yawa-hada ‘soft skin’. The paper argues that mimetics are an integral part of nominal compound word formation, enriching lexical varieties of nominal compounds. The Construction Morphology representational system proves useful to indicate where NCMs appear in the word network.

Downloaded on 14.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/ill.16.06tor/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqCi4RWoYNw5LdhD-chpckeM8N1TvH8k9xqTpYygdGO-5YU34I4
Scroll to top button