Home Chapter 7. The Finnish existential clause
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 7. The Finnish existential clause

Aspect, case marking and quantification of the S argument
  • Tuomas Huumo
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

I analyze the case marking (nominative vs. partitive) and quantification of the Finnish existential S argument (Se). I focus on Se arguments quantified by mass quantifiers (e.g. paljon ‘much’) and number quantifiers (e.g. usea ‘many’). I discuss grammatical, semantic and discourse functions of the Se argument, with an emphasis on the aspectual and quantificational meanings expressed by the construction. I argue that a quantified Se designates a bounded quantity even when marked with the partitive case, which otherwise expresses unbounded quantity. This has important repercussions to the clause-level aspectual meaning of the existential construction, especially in uses where the aspectual profile of the clause is based on nominal aspect and thus on the quantity expressed by the Se.

Abstract

I analyze the case marking (nominative vs. partitive) and quantification of the Finnish existential S argument (Se). I focus on Se arguments quantified by mass quantifiers (e.g. paljon ‘much’) and number quantifiers (e.g. usea ‘many’). I discuss grammatical, semantic and discourse functions of the Se argument, with an emphasis on the aspectual and quantificational meanings expressed by the construction. I argue that a quantified Se designates a bounded quantity even when marked with the partitive case, which otherwise expresses unbounded quantity. This has important repercussions to the clause-level aspectual meaning of the existential construction, especially in uses where the aspectual profile of the clause is based on nominal aspect and thus on the quantity expressed by the Se.

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/hcp.76.07huu/html
Scroll to top button