Diese Publikation wird Ihnen präsentiert durch Paradigm Publishing Services

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Startseite John Benjamins Publishing Company Chapter 5. Contrast and analogy in aspectual distinctions of English and Polish
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 5. Contrast and analogy in aspectual distinctions of English and Polish

The case of think predicates

Abstract

This chapter makes an attempt at finding contrasts and analogies in the aspectual system of Polish and English with the use of the Integrated Model of Aspect (Kokorniak 2018). The model employs categorisation and other conceptual mechanisms (Langacker 1987, 1999, 2009) in order to reveal that the two aspectual systems, as proposed by Comrie (1976: 25), belong to different levels of elaboration, which is why they have been considered incompatible. The author suggests that the level of aspectual classes should be used for the comparison to be possible (Vendler 1957; Croft 2012). In a detailed comparative qualitative analysis of think predicates, aspectual distinctions are considered in terms of stativity vs. dynamicity, (a)telicity, (un)boundedness, replicability vs. expandability and punctuality vs. durativity.

Abstract

This chapter makes an attempt at finding contrasts and analogies in the aspectual system of Polish and English with the use of the Integrated Model of Aspect (Kokorniak 2018). The model employs categorisation and other conceptual mechanisms (Langacker 1987, 1999, 2009) in order to reveal that the two aspectual systems, as proposed by Comrie (1976: 25), belong to different levels of elaboration, which is why they have been considered incompatible. The author suggests that the level of aspectual classes should be used for the comparison to be possible (Vendler 1957; Croft 2012). In a detailed comparative qualitative analysis of think predicates, aspectual distinctions are considered in terms of stativity vs. dynamicity, (a)telicity, (un)boundedness, replicability vs. expandability and punctuality vs. durativity.

Heruntergeladen am 23.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/hcp.73.05kok/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen