John Benjamins Publishing Company
Chapter 7. Communicating risks of an Anti-COVID-19 vaccine in Poland
-
Abstract
This study explores how three influential Polish media outlets covered the controversy around AstraZeneca vaccine in mid-March 2021, when some EU countries (though not Poland) decided to suspend this vaccine after reports of incidents of adverse side-effects related to pulmonary embolism and thrombosis. We find that the coverage was focused on risk reporting and a relatively high level of sensationalism, which is confirmed through a content analysis and a news values discourse analysis. Given the outlets’ different editorial lines, we also trace the advocacy behind each coverage of vaccinations, and the degree to which it was politicized (as opposed to science-topicalized). We present these findings in the context of media panic theory, which is in line with research on media generated “health scares” and other crises. We interpret the results of news values analysis, pointing to high Negativity and Impact, as compatible with the risks-oriented science communication typical of the profit-seeking media companies. We conclude that journalistic practices that thrive on exaggerating risk and uncertainty may well lead to public health crises, especially when such frames get later amplified by social media.
Abstract
This study explores how three influential Polish media outlets covered the controversy around AstraZeneca vaccine in mid-March 2021, when some EU countries (though not Poland) decided to suspend this vaccine after reports of incidents of adverse side-effects related to pulmonary embolism and thrombosis. We find that the coverage was focused on risk reporting and a relatively high level of sensationalism, which is confirmed through a content analysis and a news values discourse analysis. Given the outlets’ different editorial lines, we also trace the advocacy behind each coverage of vaccinations, and the degree to which it was politicized (as opposed to science-topicalized). We present these findings in the context of media panic theory, which is in line with research on media generated “health scares” and other crises. We interpret the results of news values analysis, pointing to high Negativity and Impact, as compatible with the risks-oriented science communication typical of the profit-seeking media companies. We conclude that journalistic practices that thrive on exaggerating risk and uncertainty may well lead to public health crises, especially when such frames get later amplified by social media.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Communicating science in crisis societies 1
- Chapter 2. Which facts to trust in the debate on climate change? 15
- Chapter 3. Letters to power 41
- Chapter 4. Pivoting to support science communication in times of crisis 65
- Chapter 5. COVID-19 neologisms between metaphor and culture 91
- Chapter 6. Persuasion in health communication 119
- Chapter 7. Communicating risks of an Anti-COVID-19 vaccine in Poland 143
- Chapter 8. ‘Coronavirus as a political weapon’ 169
- Chapter 9. Science versus? 197
- Index 221
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Communicating science in crisis societies 1
- Chapter 2. Which facts to trust in the debate on climate change? 15
- Chapter 3. Letters to power 41
- Chapter 4. Pivoting to support science communication in times of crisis 65
- Chapter 5. COVID-19 neologisms between metaphor and culture 91
- Chapter 6. Persuasion in health communication 119
- Chapter 7. Communicating risks of an Anti-COVID-19 vaccine in Poland 143
- Chapter 8. ‘Coronavirus as a political weapon’ 169
- Chapter 9. Science versus? 197
- Index 221
