Home General Interest Chapter 2. White, Burke and the “literary” nature of historical controversies
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 2. White, Burke and the “literary” nature of historical controversies

  • Verónica Tozzi
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

In this article, my aim is to investigate the contributions that literary theory, as a theory of each and every type of general discursive construction, can offer to shed light on the nature of historiographical controversies, not only in relation to the difficulty of consensual resolution but to the undesirability of agreeing on a single account of the past. This diagnosis, we can assert, is general and shared; nobody argues, in social sciences and humanities, in favor of the search for a unified theory, or a single account. The question is how to account for the plurality and diversity of interpretations in conflict, and the consequences of this plurality for research itself.

Abstract

In this article, my aim is to investigate the contributions that literary theory, as a theory of each and every type of general discursive construction, can offer to shed light on the nature of historiographical controversies, not only in relation to the difficulty of consensual resolution but to the undesirability of agreeing on a single account of the past. This diagnosis, we can assert, is general and shared; nobody argues, in social sciences and humanities, in favor of the search for a unified theory, or a single account. The question is how to account for the plurality and diversity of interpretations in conflict, and the consequences of this plurality for research itself.

Downloaded on 14.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/dapsac.71.02toz/html
Scroll to top button