Home Linguistics & Semiotics Dialogue and governmentality-in-action
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dialogue and governmentality-in-action

A discourse analysis of a leadership forum
  • Ann Starbæk Bager , Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen and Pirkko Raudaskoski
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Studies of Discourse and Governmentality
This chapter is in the book Studies of Discourse and Governmentality

Abstract

We explore how dialogue as governmentality-in-action was both overtly challenged and unintentionally employed in an interdisciplinary leadership development forum held at a university. We study the forum as a site to explore Foucault’s understanding of the conduct of conduct combined with Agamben’s and Deleuze’s proposals to advance and nuance the concept of dispositif. We compare dispositif with Bakhtin’s and Linell’s notions of dialogicality and dialogism as sites of centripetal and centrifugal forces with heteroglossia and orientation to third parties. This methodological move makes it possible to study dialogue and dispositif as related concepts that are lived out in situated practices. We employ membership categorisation analysis (MCA) to complement a multimodal conversation analysis of the opening lecture of the forum to show the taken-for-granted nature of the setting as a dispositif.

Abstract

We explore how dialogue as governmentality-in-action was both overtly challenged and unintentionally employed in an interdisciplinary leadership development forum held at a university. We study the forum as a site to explore Foucault’s understanding of the conduct of conduct combined with Agamben’s and Deleuze’s proposals to advance and nuance the concept of dispositif. We compare dispositif with Bakhtin’s and Linell’s notions of dialogicality and dialogism as sites of centripetal and centrifugal forces with heteroglossia and orientation to third parties. This methodological move makes it possible to study dialogue and dispositif as related concepts that are lived out in situated practices. We employ membership categorisation analysis (MCA) to complement a multimodal conversation analysis of the opening lecture of the forum to show the taken-for-granted nature of the setting as a dispositif.

Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/dapsac.66.07bag/html
Scroll to top button