Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Revisiting variation between sa and o in Sranan
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Revisiting variation between sa and o in Sranan

  • Donald Winford
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
Variation in the Caribbean
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Variation in the Caribbean

Abstract

Sranan employs two markers, sa and o, which both express some kind of futurity, but the precise nature of the difference between them has been difficult to pin down. Some researchers claim that sa and o are both primarily temporal in nature, but others treat sa as primarily modal, and o as primarily temporal, though they disagree on how far its meaning overlaps with that of o. This paper employs data from historical texts as well as examples and judgments elicited from five native speakers of Sranan in order to determine the precise nature of the differences in meaning and use between the two markers. I build on the insights of researchers like Voorhoeve and Seuren to demonstrate that sa really conveys a range of modal meanings that include futurity, strong expectation, and probability. This can be ascribed to the influence of Dutch zullen. On the other hand, o is primarily temporal in nature, expressing future tense. The analysis suggests that sa and o are not really in competition in contemporary Sranan.

Abstract

Sranan employs two markers, sa and o, which both express some kind of futurity, but the precise nature of the difference between them has been difficult to pin down. Some researchers claim that sa and o are both primarily temporal in nature, but others treat sa as primarily modal, and o as primarily temporal, though they disagree on how far its meaning overlaps with that of o. This paper employs data from historical texts as well as examples and judgments elicited from five native speakers of Sranan in order to determine the precise nature of the differences in meaning and use between the two markers. I build on the insights of researchers like Voorhoeve and Seuren to demonstrate that sa really conveys a range of modal meanings that include futurity, strong expectation, and probability. This can be ascribed to the influence of Dutch zullen. On the other hand, o is primarily temporal in nature, expressing future tense. The analysis suggests that sa and o are not really in competition in contemporary Sranan.

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cll.37.03win/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen