Home Linguistics & Semiotics Misparsing and syntactic reanalysis
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Misparsing and syntactic reanalysis

  • John Whitman
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Historical Linguistics 2009
This chapter is in the book Historical Linguistics 2009

Abstract

This paper argues that syntactic misparsing is not a significant factor in syntactic change, contrary to many earlier claims. It examines the best known examples in the literature of syntactic change resulting from alleged misparsing, and shows that the misparsing analysis is rejected in the most current research, or at best subject to alternative explanations. Cases discussed include SVO word order in Niger-Congo, the Chinese construction, and English for NP to VP infinitives. The paper concludes with a brief comparison of the roles of misparsing, broadly construed, in syntactic and phonological change.

Abstract

This paper argues that syntactic misparsing is not a significant factor in syntactic change, contrary to many earlier claims. It examines the best known examples in the literature of syntactic change resulting from alleged misparsing, and shows that the misparsing analysis is rejected in the most current research, or at best subject to alternative explanations. Cases discussed include SVO word order in Niger-Congo, the Chinese construction, and English for NP to VP infinitives. The paper concludes with a brief comparison of the roles of misparsing, broadly construed, in syntactic and phonological change.

Downloaded on 30.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.320.04whi/html
Scroll to top button